No. This isn’t “another way to pull more from the chain.” The chain is already pulling from everyone via DHF issuance — this just makes it measurable and attributable.

And the “who does this account belong to?” angle is a distraction.

Judge the output:

• public JSON dataset,

• documented assumptions,

• reproducible methodology,

• and on-chain verifiable inputs.

If the numbers are wrong, call the numbers. If the model is wrong, name the rule.
If the only objection is “I don’t like anonymous accounting,” that’s basically an argument for staying blind.