BTW if merit, or the combined votes of the many, has no influence on the way the top 21 is composed, we might as well just auction off witness positions twice a year and share the proceeds through the reward pool.
Or is that a toxic thought?
BTW if merit, or the combined votes of the many, has no influence on the way the top 21 is composed, we might as well just auction off witness positions twice a year and share the proceeds through the reward pool.
Or is that a toxic thought?
RE: Surprise Koala