Well, the video won't load for me. But I suppose that based on the title and description of the video, I'll just say, an unpopular opinion doesn't make the opinion any less valid...
I'm just gonna come clean on my opinion of United States foreign policy right now. I'm not a proponent of endless counter-insurgency wars for profit that we've been engaged in for the better part of two decades, But... I can get behind a reunification of the Korean peninsula for several reasons.
1.) It would have a clear end game. Unlike the "war on terror", which is basically an endless battle against a faceless enemy. Taking the Korean war from cold to hot would actually have a clear cut outcome.
2.) The United States dominate air superiority would basically be able to strategically knock out all artillery and strategic targets well before the DPRK even knew what hit them, allowing any ground troops south of the DMZ to move in quickly and effectively. Which leads to...
3.) The likelihood of any other troop deployment to be minimal, if at all. Assuming that most of the malnourished, North Korean military forces would pretty much defect and submit, not much unlike the Iraqi forces in the first Gulf War, it's not likely that the U.S. and South Korea would have much of a problem given that points 1, and 2 of my comment are already pretty well established.
In closing, the DPRK doesn't have nuclear capabilities like most people think. They don't have sophisticated guidance systems, ICBM's or "modern" nuclear capabilities. They're basically still in the Soviet, atomic age... Which is another reason I wouldn't see a problem with just dealing with this now. Before they do evolve into something more problematic.
Just my unpopular 2 cents...
RE: "FIRE AND FURY" in North Korea? How about a history lesson?