I appreciate that you invest your time to reply to me. I know you did not encourage buying anything in this article.

I can say with confidence that earthing is indeed not real. Believing in things like this stems from ignorance or the misunderstanding of how the human body works and how the earth works for that matter.

Let me make an example out of earthing.
In the text in your post there is this fancy word ion which is by itself scientific and sounds scientific, but in the context of earthing it has no point. It is just a word to trick people into thinking it was scientific.
You can have an elecrostatic charge through wearing the wrong shoes or rubbing a balloon on yourself which is indeed negative (100 points to earthing specialists).
The thing is this charge depletes in mere seconds to your surroundings or it discharges through your hand if you touch your car or another person or something else it can discharge to and the best thing is it has no effects on your health whatsoever.
So no it is not scientific at all. It takes scientific principles and mutates them to fit a narrative that most of the time wants to sell you something useless for a lot of money.

Masaru Emoto's and Gerald Pollack's work on water is not scientifically reproducable and due to this failed at the peer review.
For example the claim water had something like a memory is a failed hypothesis.

I don't say you shouldn't try it.

I just want to say that this has NOTHING to do with science.
Masura Emoto got his title for alternative medicine which has nothing to do witch science either.