On your end, if validation of this system is your short term goal, I would request Dr. Suhas to follow the criteria that SRI has established for "LENR" validation (I paraphrase):
On demand on/off control.
Consistent results from identical, separate and complete systems.
Moveable system, can be tested in different, independent labs.
System components manufactured to the identical written specifications.

Dr. Suhas has the burden of validating his calorimetry. As you may have noticed lately, this can be a serious bone of contention. The expert in this area is Dr. Fran Tanzella at SRI. No doubt Dr. Tanzella has a colleague in India that is equally as competent as he is in validating calorimetry measurement setup and data collection. Finding this expert is a good place to start your validation efforts.

I would ask Dr. Suhas to verify that the materials and components he uses are not only well-documented, but also commercially available (I believe that this looks to be the case from what I have seen in the videos). Dr. James A. Patterson got bitten by this problem by having only a single European supplier for the porous nickel coating he used in his Patterson Power Cell. When the supplier when out-of-business, the nickel power could not be reproduced. Be careful to get full materials disclosure for replication purposes. And best of luck.