All I've seen you do is talk in circles and tell AnCaps that they are shills, even though AnCaps explicitly state they are against the concept of a ruling class.
I read one of your articles and it was the same thing...references to your past as an "AnCrap" and your "seeing the light" and becoming an "AnCom"... you seem to think you have some kind of secret knowledge which elevates you above the rest of us but I have yet to see you convey an actual idea or explain WTF you're even talking about when you toss out comments like "keep working, stop paying" (OK, Yoda!).
Its as if the science of economics doesn't even exist to you...and, like all commies I've ever encountered, you seem to think that people working for self-interested reasons instead of "love for their fellow man" is some great evil--if I get paid $10/hour to clean toilets that's me being a shill/slave of the 'oligarchy' but if I do it out of 'love' for humanity then scraping skidmarks off of the toilet bowl is fine, LOL.
You don't address any points/ideas Larken or anyone else makes and you don't make any points of your own other than to blame all of the world's ills on "crapitalism", which is odd, since (the way AnCaps define "capitalism") it only represents the ideas of peaceful trade and wealth accumulation. Why do you get to say that State Communism "isn't real communism" but we don't get to say that State Capitalism "isn't real capitalism"? Why has state-run capitalism done so much better than state-run communism and do you maybe think this gives us a hint at what system is most compatible w/human-nature?
RE: Collective vs. Private Ownership (Part 2 of a Series)