In the classical division of power, especially in the EU where the relationship between the legislature and the executive branch is destroyed, the justice branch of the authorities is particularly important. This represents the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg, and of course, it is inhabited by people who ensure that they do not go into disputes with the central authority in Brussels. Indeed, the European Court has always decided in the interests of "unification", while without a doubt, the European Court of Human Rights decides against the provisions of the existing agreements.
This undermines legal certainty in the Union. Only a person who knows his mode of work well and who has an overview of the non-transparent jungle of European legal regulations can scatter a European Court of Justice. And even in such cases, they make sure that any system of the disputed matter is a political slap and silence (for example, the case of Roman Herzok with Dr. Luder Gerkenoms in 2008 - Herzog silenced). I am not a ruler in order to enter into discussions about the idea and practice of Europeanism.
For example, judgments of the European Court of Anti-Discrimination Laws, Labor Market Policy and Asylum Law, Roman Herzog has step-by-step demonstrated that the highest European Court of Justice shuns shamefully the fundamental competences of the Member States and undermines their national sovereignty, without Only that it does not consider me to be unambiguous in terms of agreements, but even turns them into their opposite.
Thus, there are many examples that show that the European Court of Justice has consciously and systematically ignored the fundamental principles of (western) judicial legal interpretation. It does not substantiate its decisions sufficiently carefully, interferes with the will of the legislator, and often goes even to its opposite, and invents new legal principles that can constitute new legal practice in subsequent judgments. This means that the European Court of Justice undermines the competence of the Member States even in the very core of national competences.
It shares the right to create a system of injustice.