Four years ago when he was staying in Delhi's Masnad, he used to live in different countries of the world, among the expatriate Indians and his supporters-the enthusiasm was seen in the eyes. India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi used to represent the country like an actual statesman on each of his foreign tours.
In political and diplomatic areas and in various media, it was said that India long time got a qualified leader; Who is in the international arena to prevent India's importance and influence?
Recently, when Modi walked to London to attend the Commonwealth summit in addition to meeting UK political leaders, the traditional picture was not seen. On the other hand, protest-resistance on the road against Modi; 'Modi go back' sounds.
Because? Recently, two horrific rape incidents that took place in India, which have shaken the whole country. One of them is a victim of brutal rape and murder, an eight-year-old girl named Asifa of Kathua in Jammu and Kashmir province.
Demonstrators demonstrate on the streets of India during Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to London; Source: Twitter @iScrew
The other happened in Uttar Pradesh's Unnao area, where a Bharatiya Janata Party legislator was accused of raping a sixteen daughter and in spite of her survival, her father could not get salvation. On the complaint of rape, he was arrested after the daughter's father's handwriting with the supporters of the legislator. However, due to the fatality, he was taken to jail hospital because of injuries, there was his mysterious death.
In addition to these two disgusting events, as well as the tendency to increase women's popularity in general and protests against them in London, the protest against them is strengthened because of not taking the special steps of the prime minister himself. In the Parliament Square of London, there was an annulment of the tricolor of India, for which it was also apologized to India on behalf of Britain.
Demonstrate demonstrations of Tamil community living in Britain against Narendra Modi; Source: Twitter
The British press is also voiced
The British press did not take this protest lightly against Modi. The Guardian newspaper also cites India as a 'republic of fear' on the issue of various torture incidents in India; It is said that Britain should pressurize this issue over India.
Now the question is here. It is necessary for the international community to have a strict position in relation to the continuous persecution and persecution happening in India. There should be external opinion on the internal events of any country on the question of human rights so that the ruling class of that country becomes more attentive in observing the monarchy.
However, despite the attacks on minority groups of Muslims, Dalits and women in India, there is no doubt that the important forces in the West, including Britain, will not be disturbed. As India is a 'fearful republic', it does not seem that special people will be seen to face the problem of its inner surroundings.
The western world will not flaunt the Modi government
The main reason for this is geo-economics. In the wake of a sensitive and uncertain political event like Breaksite, Britain's own position is quite confusing. Although the political leadership that Britain's 'ride on the tiger' has made national pathological pride show the European Union's (EU) erosion, they know that in the near future, questions about Britain's economic health will be questioned. And if Britain's Kanders can not make an alternative to the EU, then their nationalism will collapse and they will have to contend with them.
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi; Source: Author: Balatokyo; Wikimedia Commons
Britain's Theresa Mara government is now looking for new business partners. And there was a special focus on Britain towards Commonwealth countries. In this case, because India's economy is huge, it is desperate to join forces with the government ahead of the Modi government. Now that the British authorities have accepted the British administration in London, is it like that?
The same is true for the EU. As Britain is interested in strengthening bilateral trade with India, the EU is also optimistic that they can strengthen free trade relations with India after Britain's departure from their organization.
Nobody wants to be deprived of Laxmi grace by tied up with a fast developing economy like India. And it is necessary to say that no party in Europe will touch the Modi government on such issues as anti-apartheid or human rights violations.
India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi with London Prime Minister Theresa Marie; Source: Twitter handle of British Prime Minister Theresa May 
The same thing is true in the United States. Although former US President Barack Obama had warned the Modi government about some of the warnings about religious separation during his visit to India in 2015, his descendants Donald Trump did not pay any attention to that path.
On the contrary, Afghanistan and China have repeatedly told India's geo-strategic huge importance to Trump; Asia-Pacific has changed its name to Indo-Pacific; New Delhi's big role in Kabul wanted to put pressure on Pakistan. Trump has not said anything against India, but it is relevant to visa, trade and environmental matters, and its 'America First' policy.
What did the United States do after Tiananmen Square of China?
In fact, the role of ideals in the current world politics is very limited. At the end of the cold war, despite the infamous Tiananmen Square attack, there was dissatisfaction with the US process against Beijing's repression in many cases. US President George HW Bush's administration condemned the "doctrine of nothing" in the US Congress. Because that's the same. Boycitting emerging economic power like China means to hurt your own financial interests.
In the 1980s, if economic importance can be higher, there is no mention in today's world. Geopolitics and geopolitics also have more importance in the geopolitics. Although Western economies continue to dominate the world even today, the economic importance of India and China has increased today. And so they are better aware of their internal issues, they are better off because of their ignorance. Therefore, 'let the chawpah, fire, Have your own interests first. '
Modi's policy of boycott of the West did not last long
Modi was boycotted by the western world after the 2002 Gujarat riots. But when the image of Modi's rise was clear in Indian politics, then those western states started accepting Modi. Because there is nothing else. One of them is going to be the chief treasurer of the world's biggest economy; And secondly, because of being the Chief Minister of the developed state like Gujarat, Modi's reputation was as an efficient and development-friendly administrator. To keep him away for so many days due to his moral means that he would miss the huge economic potential of India and Gujarat. When the grammar of the global economy is becoming increasingly difficult, the countries of cheap labor, like India or China, can not be easily distanced by the businessmen of international trade.
US President Donald Trump; Source: Author: Gage Skidmore; Wikimedia Commons
One thing is noteworthy, as far as Modi's government does not talk about his government's 'Make in India' initiative, it does not even have a favor to suppress the majority in India. Even if Modi goes out and says proudly about India's rapid development, he does not have to face it as uncomfortable questions. There is no reason to be of any Indian top leader, because of this huge economic potential of the country. This safeguard prevents them from attacking them. How long will India's political leadership hide its failure behind the shield of this economy, now wait and watch..
I love to follow and Upvote
Special Thanks to :
@Originalworks
@TrevonJB
#CraigRant
@Craig-grant
#upvoteforupvote
#followforfollow
@Bidder
