With this essay I try to create a clash of thoughts, between education based on cultural understanding, scientific education, objective and critical, trying to generate a cognitive dissonance in people, and possibly interested in expanding their own truth through the doubt.
The religions and cultures of the world must be studied from skepticism and not from mysticism.
The world needs an education based on science and not on assumptions.
Skepticism allows free thinking and the development of new ideas of sustainability.
Mysticism eliminates critical and objective thinking, allowing ideas without verification.
If we do not learn to doubt things, we will always be "believing" what they tell us.
Doubt allows you to establish criteria for personality and individual perception.
The beliefs pass from generation to generation, it is up to us to verify these beliefs.
Doubting our beliefs makes us know our roots and the reason for them.
We have to be objective in the understanding of human subjectivity, to demonstrate that education is the most important thing.
Objectivity shows where we come from and subjectivity imagines where we can go.
Scientific education seeks feasibility and efficiency in all fields of research.
Education and scientific understanding can not be a privilege, it has to be a human duty.
It can be concluded that the doubt as a principle, allows to find in an individual way the best forms of collective development and to make of the scientific education, the most viable way to establish criteria of investigation, communication and development of the different biopsychosocial questions that humanity presents.
Jesus Cabrera