Human nature and modern human

Since humanity has become a society, rules or laws have become indispensable for people. People need a set of laws to live in a community. Otherwise, it cannot be mentioned in the current society. In a society not established under specific laws, the law is individual. The fact that an individual creates his law in his present form applies not only to an individual or a group but also to every individual in his existing society.

Because, since each individual creates his own law, he naturally builds this law for his own benefit. This means that the way to produce the law for its own benefit applies to every individual in society. Therefore, the dispute arises in the same sense as the contractor philosophers. The existence of the conflict is therefore parallel to the existence of society. This conflict between individuals continues until the total laws or laws covering the whole society emerge. So there is a constant conflict and insecurity in society. Many modern political philosophers create such a social-individual relationship before the congress and the state. This discussion of what is essentially human nature refers to the basis and necessity of the contract after the design and definition of human nature. Although such debates slightly lag behind today's political philosophy, the discussion of the dynamics between the individual and the society remains up to date.

In the philosophy of politics, in relation to human nature, the modern philosophies of politics have expressed different views as good or bad about the nature of man. Human nature conflicts with other individuals regardless of whether they are good or bad. This is because there is no law or state to cover any individual in society. Conflict arises in the public opinion, because the individual is the foundation or source of the law, and this applies to all others. The existence and continuation of the conflict environment is a situation to be avoided for the individual and society. Because in this case the individual has fear and fear about the loss of what he has. For the individual, there is a concern for the security of property and property security. In such societies where individuals are legal, a world or society in which the powerful one prevails emerges. There is a situation against those who are weak in such a society. This is true not only for people who make weak people, but also for strong people. Because it is possible to talk about a constant conflict.

For these reasons, a type of contract is required for people. It is possible to see the logic of the contract in all modern political philosophers. The logic of the convention is to create a coherent and balanced society among the individuals who make up the society. Such contracts are constantly emerging in human history. These conventions have emerged to provide a balance between individuals, both in the manner defined by the contracting philosophers and in writing.

Image Source

Therefore, despite the fact that the contract is as negative as humanity, today the logic of the contract continues. These contracts can be written in writing and accepted by the community and made law. But it can be accepted by society without a written rule. All these written and unwritten contracts and the rules they bring are intended to eliminate the conflict or confusion between human or humanity. While the conventions aim to serve such a social situation, is it possible to say that in society all of these rules have occurred in practice or that all of these rules create a real conflict or confidence for the people?

Radically, it does not say that today's human nature is actually good or bad. Because, unlike modern political philosophers, people are neither good nor bad. Human is homo sapiens on one hand and homo dementia on the other. This, in a sense, means that man is bad in a good sense. The best word outlining the condition is that the person is in the gray pan. For this reason, it is possible to say that human being is good or bad by nature and that all laws established or made based on this theory are wrong.