I'm thinking that maybe this issue can't be cleared up without the risk of turning EOS ERC-20 tokens into 'securities'. It seems that those with money to 'invest' must do so on the assumption that:
- EOS is going to be a great platform.
- It is indeed beyond the reach of the SEC and other regulatory bodies.
- Because widespread distribution of tokens is essential (for network effect), and the most committed token holders will be those who purchased ERC-20, the token most likely to be used will derive from the ERC-20 token.
- The final EOS tokens will be issued in proportion to the ERC-20 token holdings, because otherwise a top-heavy stake distribution (like Steem has) may reduce the likelihood of widespread adoption.
I'm looking forward to investing my time developing software for the EOS blockchain, instead of a large token purchase, as this avoids making some of these assumptions. However, I've almost just convinced myself to to buy some tokens too!
RE: block.one – Statement Regarding the SEC’s Report on The DAO