All of those violent acts are committed by people who hide behind secrecy: the police, the law makers, the regulators. It is their violent acts that need to be exposed and individuals need to take personal responsibility.
Yes, radical transparency would have kept Ross out of jail because he wouldn't have operated that business. His problem was his belief in privacy was illusionary.
I could add a few more:
What about the extortionist?
What about the kid napper?
What about the thief?
What about the hitman?
You see the same thing that enables the sex worker also enables all of these bad things. The existence of these bad things is the basis of justification for rule by force and government invasion of our privacy. We need non-violent solutions to these bad things.
In a world with complete transparency, no one would dare throw stones for trivial things least they be found guilty of assault.
RE: Does Freedom Require Radical Transparency or Radical Privacy?