Excellent article!

"The key mistake of the argument lies in its misconception of property rights, we believe that property rights are absolutely based on goods (or space), and that the total amount of goods (or space) is limited, then the principle of force or First-come-first-served exclusive property rights are established, resulting in unfair distribution of property in essence. Actually, property rights are determined by behavioral boundaries. How do you understand this statement?"

This is an excellent critique of the 'property rights' school of thought. Property as a basis for society is fine until it isn't. Property is not a basis for all issues, and when those issues are paramount, trying to propetise them will just make them worse.