I am like 99% sure if Bitrex starts losing money because Alice is not actually sending them money that they credit to her account it wont fly for long.
Alice can then move to a new exchange.
That wont be cool with this shit either and she would be in deep water pretty fast especially if it goes public that Alice has been scrwed over.
You are struggling to defend
, but he's not even here defending himself.
Why would he bother. He stated that 3/5 entities can make your wallet basically useless. Right now, if you pay attention to whats being said isnt refuting what he said, but rather refuting about how bad it would be for Alice.
And the only disagreement we have is on a gradient of her being basically fucked and highly inconvenienced to completely screwed and highly inconvenienced.
Literall all you are saying is that
Alice would only be mostly fucked and unable to use her wallet. She wont be 100% fucked so its totally cool guys.
But that right there is conceding the argument at a base level. You took it for granted he was right from the get go and then reform the argument around how she can just walk it off and man up while 60% of her transactions fail and every exchange gives her the finger lol.
Were splitting hairs here and its bordering on comical. Literally NOBODY is going to want to be in a position where 3/5 mining pools decide to make your life a living hell.
RE: Dan Larimer Cannot Censor Accounts with 51% of Hashes