'Public administration is an essential part in governing the state system. Regarding the fluctuations in the quality of governance of the country on their efficiency. Since its independence, its recruitment, especially discrimination quotas, is being questioned frequently. There has also been a reason to create anger in society. Rather than ignoring more talent, it is logical to assume that the opportunity of appointing less meritorious students in the privilege quota is playing a role in reducing the efficiency of public administration. Contrary to the constitutional commitment of equal opportunities for job opportunities, different arrangements have been going on for ages. And it has expanded for indefinite period too. Many committees-officially commissioned on these issues. Research has been done at the private level.
The Public Service Commission (PSC) had earlier voiced the opposite of the quota system. It was reflected in their annual report. A lot of editorial-sub-editorials have been written in this newspaper column. Investigative reports have come in some cases, but the situation has not changed. The current government's 2009 election pledge has denied the importance of merit of merit of the charter. There is no visible sign of the implementation of the commitment to reorganize the quota system by prioritizing the merit of the National Purification Tactics made in 2012. Political commitment is unrelated to reality. So the discussion on the matter is always relevant.
Our constitution says that the employment of the Republic will have equal rights for everyone's appointment. As well as considering the reality, the Constitutionists have also kept provisions for reservation of quota for backward classes of society. Now, 45 percent of the candidates are appointed through the merit of higher civil service. In this way, different cadres of the public administration are being employed. These include administration, diplomats, government college teachers and doctors from the police. Similarly, the appointment of a lower court judge. But there is no quota in the rank of commissioned officer of the military. Mathematics in the field of employment.
Immediately after the independence of the executive order introduced the quota system. There are quota for tribals, women, district and the disabled. It is 25 percent. And the privilege quota of freedom fighters 30 percent. For the time being, for the time the freedom of the educated freedom fighters was appointed in the important position of the state, it had its logic. Was a passionate aspect But the moral aspect of giving it a durability is questioned. Some of the backward classes of society or the number were logical, they could have been accepted. So far, the number of garbage registered by the number of fisheries registered will be 1 percent of the total population. In this case, 30 percent of their job rights can be given rationality? Unselfish arrangements are also made to keep the vacancies empty if there is no suitable candidate in any quota.
The way the district quota is kept, it is unrealistic and complicated by the work of the employers. According to the latest populism, the quota was divided in every district on the basis of population. It is not understandable why advanced districts will come under this facility. Considering the socioeconomic aspects of different districts of the country, a few quarters of the lower districts can be kept in quota of backward areas. There is a need to keep women quota for a while
The tribal quota is much more in the country than in their statistics. On the other hand, enjoying the benefits of the three relatively developed communities. No representation of plain tribes like Santal, Munda, is not visible in the civil service. So there are some ideas about the quantity and layout of this quota. Maybe someone will not say to give up the quota system. It was undivided India. During the Pakistan period too. There are still India and Pakistan. However, our differences with their social workplace is very broad. India is divided into different castes. There also the reserved quota applied to the disadvantaged classes If the parents and the parents of a candidate of those classes are not below a certain level, then they are not given the opportunity. If another member enjoys this quota, his next generation can not do this. There is also a lot of anger against the arrangements. Various experiments have been gradually revamped.
The world is getting smaller. We are related to different countries in almost every matter. To understand your share in this competitive world, you need talent. To do so, it is logical to demand the highest merit list for each job. Along with this, there is a lot of adverse conditions being created by pushing them away from injustice.
It can be said that, if not only meritorious, they will be a better future officer, it can not be said with emphasis. It can not be true in all cases. After recruitment, proper training, recruitment at the appropriate place, and the ability to work legally in an environment free of charge and necessary supervision controller to create an efficient officer. But at the very beginning, if there is less talent than the more meritorious students, the problem will start from here. And it has been happening for a long time. As a result, downstream values of the entire civil administration are noticeable. The development partners are expressing concern over the development partners. Various training programs were taken as a remedy. It is also seen that those training is not capable of receiving some officers. Its main reason is the lack of merit.
Many commissions-committees are already mentioned in the ongoing quota system. The latest PSC conducted a survey through two former experienced officers with the financial assistance of UNDP in 2008. The whole system is unfair and publicity