All animals are part of the animal kingdom. All animals have consciousness. The same in kind (kin, kingdom of animal), difference in degrees (consciousness power). All animals have subjective preferences. All animals, think, feel and act. No matter how much the intellectuals that many anarchists or voluntarists want to appeal to their "authoritative" arguments in order to deny these realities and how our actions affects others, these realities can't be denied. Their arguments are constricted and limited through denial of reality and have not formulated a consistent philosophy.
Morality is a concept of how to value our actions with higher order consciousness abstraction of concepts. Nonhuman animals lack this higher order degree of consciousness. This does not negate their subjective valuations, their thought, emotions and actions.
Morality is a concept for us to understand how OUR actions affect OTHERS. It's not a concept to deny how our actions affect others simply because they are nonhuman. Morality applies to our actions across-the-board, whole-scale, now to the narrow selective application of human-only perceptions.
If you want to fantasize and deny that animals are their own bodies, their own property, then you can continue to deny obvious reality and live in fantasy.
Survival is not a justification for morality. Survival does not dictate morality. Morality is supposed to dictate our choices for survival. Choosing to do something to survive does not make it a de facto moral action. Someone tells you to kill someone or else they kill you. Your choice is a choice, to survive or die. To survive would not be moral to kill an innocent person in this case. Survival does not determine morality.
Take care. Peace. Upvoted.
RE: A Quick Secular Proof of Objective Morality