When the administration of President Barack Obama rushed towards the nuclear agreement with Iran, and the American media told her that the Iranian regime would open up and become moderate, but after nearly two years of that agreement, is anyone who can face the world and say that the behavior of the Iranian regime has gone towards the behavior of a state ?! Since that agreement, Iran has extended more and is almost taking control of Mashreq countries.
The uproar over that agreement, and with its return, accompanied by speculation about what US President Donald Trump could decide, an expert from the President's circle explained his conjectures:
The need for a regime change and the possibility of a military option on the table, because these steps are necessary to give greater chance to the success of the "soft power" negotiations and to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. My regime's change would actually be the most effective way to end Iran's nuclear ambitions. There is no guarantee that any new government may abandon the program, but it can be a condition for recognition by the United States, abandonment of the nuclear program.
The second component of a successful strategy is for all those concerned and surrounding this agreement to make sure that the failure of the "soft power" attempts will inevitably lead to a military strike. "The military threat must be placed on the table, although some Iranian military programs are underground and inaccessible, but we can still destroy many of them and destroy most of Iran's military capabilities." In his view, such a threat would serve as a strong incentive to act in good faith, even once, to reach a negotiated peace settlement that could end Iran's nuclear program. The best way to do this is for the Iranians to know that "we will support the removal of their government, We will destroy their military capabilities. "
Nuclear disarmament requires a fully functioning delivery system. The removal of Iran's missile program from the nuclear deal allowed Iran to continue to work on half of its program, while remaining "technically compliant" with the terms of the nuclear deal. Tehran has repeatedly pledged to continue building what it calls its missile defense capabilities, in clear defiance of Western opponents, while Washington says Iran is violating the 2015 nuclear deal. Recently, given President Trump's threats to abandon the agreement reached by his predecessor Barack Obama, Iran To contact representatives of the five signatories of the agreement, opening talks on the "removal" of its missile program. A report by the «Reuters» on the sixth of this month, that on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly last month, Iran informed members of international powers that it does not mind discussing the missile program; to remove concerns. An Iranian source told Reuters: "The Americans expressed concern about Iran's missile capability," Foreign Minister Mohammed Javad Zarif replied.
Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Nafia said that Ali Reza Mirosefi, director of communications at the Iranian mission to the United Nations, did not stop repeating that everything in the report was wrong and incorrect. The Iranian propaganda machine began to work, especially in response to leaks that American sanctions would include the Revolutionary Guards. He also stepped on the offensive against America, Israel and Saudi Arabia. Hezbollah Secretary General Hassan Nasrallah threatened Iran with a decisive and harsh response. Washington Revolutionary Guards on the list of terrorism. It seems that America is "ready" to put Iran and its threats at stake, especially after members of the Somali army on Sunday succeeded in hunting two Iranian fishing vessels were fishing in Somali territorial waters, killing one captain and one crew members, while the other boat fled.
There are North Korea and there are Iran under a wave of speculation about the possibility of imminent military action. North Korea groaned under a painful economic boycott. As for Iran, the US president must certify compliance with the provisions of the agreement every 90 days. It is not expected that this week, but the matter will be brought to Congress, which will have 60 days to re-impose sanctions on Iran. If he did, he would "revolutionize" the European "allies" as well as the Russians and the Chinese. The Europeans support the nuclear deal with Iran because it lifts US sanctions and allows them to reestablish economic ties with Iran. On Monday morning, an official with the Iranian Ministry of Communications said that Germany was waiting for the US decision to begin funding a railway project in Iran worth 3 billion euros. Iran knows it has to move the Europeans because US sanctions will force European companies to rethink any deal with Iran for fear of sanctions. According to a well-informed US source, this is what President Trump intends to do, and Iran has pushed itself to abandon the nuclear deal.
During the negotiations that led to the agreement, the Iranians negotiated a position of strength, and the weakness of former US Secretary of State John Kerry was his acceptance that the final agreement would include a rewording of the Security Council resolution that limits Iran's ability to develop ballistic missiles. Resolution No. 1929, adopted in June 2010, stipulated that "Iran should not engage in any activity related to missiles capable of delivering nuclear weapons. And that States take all necessary measures to prevent the transfer of technology or provide technical assistance to Iran in connection with such activities. But during talks on the nuclear program in Vienna, Zarif called for lifting the ban on the development of ballistic missiles as part of the agreement. His argument was that if Iran abandons the nuclear weapons program, any development of missiles can not be linked to systems capable of transferring nuclear weapons. , The phrase contained