Today we are exploring the topic CPS: is it lawful or legal? Let's jump in.

Lawfulness

We are going to visit USCODE, all codes signed into law are denoted with an asteric. (See example below)

So we see that title 35 - 40 are actually signed into positive law. Title42, however is not. Just a side note Social Security as a whole is not signed into positive law.

Positive law means:

Law enacted by a governmental authority

Enacted:

the process of turning a bill into law

Do you see how this is troubling? Let's specifically look for CPS code. Hammer it down.

NOT EVEN CAPTA is signed into positive law

CAPTA is the newer primary source for CPS authority. It's held under chapter 6 (and like many other programs insist its a public law "110 - 351"). The truth is that under scrutiny there is no lawful ground on which it can stand as again, it is not signed into positive law.

Is CPS legal?

While writing laws legislator generally produces bills that either rights strip, then ammend that to further a bill; or make rights friendly bills (not so often).

The truth of the matter is yes it's legal to an extent that it does not hurt or creates injury and that it does not infringe upon rights held by citizens. It's legal kidnapping.

I've demonstrated time after time that CPS lacks jurisdiction to take children. It is also fraud. It is also deprivation of rights. Hopefully, a light is going off.. as the three case files specify who has a right to children? Parents!

The heart of the matter is: everytime CPS exercises authority (even in deserving scenarios) someone is deprived of a right.

When the state moves to destroy weakened family bonds, it must provide the parents with fundamentally fair procedures. - Santosky v Kramer

---

Here is the truth

Cursed is he who accepts a bribe to strike down an innocent person - Deuteronomy 27:25

And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you: whose judgment now of a long time lingereth not, and their damnation slumbereth not. - 2 Peter 2:3

__

opinion

Todays lesson was small yet potent. I think the hang up is that many do not have enough confidence to read and start a process. The truth is it takes time, but research will always pay off.

It is the belief of certain judges that if family court issues continue to appear in Upper Courts; it will not bode well for the "statutes." Eventually they will be struck, I believe.

The hope of this article is to demonstrate the lawfulness of CPS. Which I believe I did demonstrate. As we progess, we will be simplifying the provisions. Thats all I am doing, simplifying everything in short easy to digest articles so the reader can understand perfectly the subject matter.

Can you understand the simple outline? Is CPS lawful? Is it legal? Let me know