The story is one that we hear repeatedly: parents take their child to the doctor for an accidental injury or an illness and end up being accused by a doctor of abusing their child.The doctor calls Child Protective Services, and the stunned parents watch their child be taken away by social workers. Often, one of the parents will go to jail for accusations of child abuse.
There is little to no due process, and the multiple court hearings that follow are merely an illusion of attempts at justice, since the accusing doctor, a Child Abuse Pediatrician, has essentially become judge and jury. Opposing viewpoints by other doctors are often ridiculed or disregarded.
It matters little if the parents have no history of violence, or that there is not a single shred of real forensic evidence which supports the diagnosis of abuse.
Once the Child Abuse Pediatrician decrees that child abuse has happened, the Child Protective System, as well as the foster care and adoption system, becomes activated, and parents watch in horror as their children are stripped away from them, sometimes permanently.
This is the current state of pediatrics in the US today... a concerned parent takes their child to the doctor after an accident- that is usually as traumatic for the parent as the child- only to have them taken away by ideologues with no particular specialty except the politically motivated, non-medical Child Abuse Pediatrician. These "doctors" have no interest whatever in treating patients, only in proving abuse- no abuse- no justification for the "specialty." There is a long history of child advocacy in America, if indeed that's what it can accurately be called. In the late 19th century there were the "Orphan Trains" that ripped children from the arms of loving parents to be put in the hands of adoptive parents in the midwest, whose only motive was most often a cheap source of labor.
Early in the 20th century a plethora of child advocacy groups sprang up usually in urban areas where wealthy matrons searched out impoverished children and took them from their parents- with the full support of the legal system- to be put in "homes," generally orphanages with conditions far worse from which they had come. These homes were rife with abuse, both sexual and physical, but that was a price these mavens of empathy were perfectly willing to pay... after all the appearance of caring trumps the misery they create, right up to this day. The only crimes of the parents, from then until now, is being poor... the perception among the elites that run the NGO's and influence legislation is that poor people are incapable of caring- that's an emotion reserved for the elites. A new elite has taken over the empathy game, they've become more powerful and refined in their programs, but the result is the same.
Now the medical profession has become the arbiter, the new gestapo. Mirroring the Nazi T-4 program, the doctors have become the ultimate authority... who better, people tend to trust doctors. But these are no ordinary doctors, these are doctors with a cause (and medicine is not at the root). The purpose of these doctors is to destroy families, and they're becoming very good at what they do, particularly since they have the power of the state behind them- CPS, the family court and a legion of other "experts."
When it comes to the seizure of children from their families by Child Protective Services, doctors don’t merely play a peripheral role, contributing their medical findings to the body of evidence gathered by law enforcement investigators.
On the contrary, doctors known as Child Abuse Pediatricians are at the very heart of what has become known as state-sponsored child abductions and medical kidnappings.
Though board certification for the sub-specialty of Child Abuse Pediatricians did not exist before 2010, their history traces back to the early and mid 1900s.Instead of being built upon a foundation of protecting children from abuse, the Child Abuse Pediatrics field is largely a house of cards built on a flawed foundation with a controversial, decades-long history hidden in the background.
Early medical papers by a small group of doctors framed the child abuse story from the very beginning in such a way that silenced opposing viewpoints. Their strategy has been to develop policies that anticipate arguments and squelch opposing voices by maligning or discrediting them.
These tactics are in use today by Child Abuse Pediatricians. These doctors heavily influence the policies of courts, legislators, the child welfare system, and the American Academy of Pediatrics regarding child abuse.
It began with "Battered Child Syndrome," In a paper for the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), Dr. C. Henry Kempe and the other authors concluded that:
The battered-child syndrome … should be considered in any child exhibiting evidence of possible trauma or neglect (fracture of any bone, subdural hematoma, multiple soft tissue injuries, poor skin hygiene, or malnutrition) or where there is a marked discrepancy between the clinical findings and the historical data as supplied by the parents.
When they take their child to the local children’s hospital or emergency room because the child has an accidental injury, exhibits symptoms they cannot explain, or has a mysterious bump that appears, Child Abuse Pediatricians are quickly called in, and their child is subjected to a full skeletal survey (x-rays). This is standard practice today.
Shouldn’t these medical conditions, which are all documented today in the medical literature, be the focus of medical doctors, rather than child abuse?
Abusing children can be a criminal offense, and is generally part of law enforcement investigations and detectives trained in forensic evidence, something doctors are not trained to do.
Most doctors who are Child Abuse Specialists only look at medical records, and never even interview the child or family members.Numerous families have lost their children due to accusations by Child Abuse Pediatricians that they abused their children, while other doctors, including recognized medical experts in their fields have diagnosed medical conditions that the parents did not cause.
Parents and advocates alike are dismayed when judges, social workers, and sometimes even law enforcement ignore the reports of upwards of a dozen experts in favor of a single report of a narrative put forth by the Child Abuse Pediatrician.
We recently reported that there has been a well-orchestrated effort by an elite group of Child Abuse Pediatricians known as the Helfer Society, founded by Dr. Ray E. Helfer in 1999, to influence the way that the media and the public view child abuse issues.
In other words there are already institutions in place to tackle child abuse including medical specialists such as radiologists, orthopedists, etc.. CPS was in fact established because of doctors and their often misdiagnosed incidents of Battered Child Syndrome. Dr. Helfer's daughter herself said: According to a paper by Jennifer Crane of the Centre for the History of Medicine, Kempe’s daughter Annie Kempe said that her father “found it was common practice to offer ‘patently absurd’ explanations for the injuries of children,” who were:
misdiagnosed with rare brittle bone diseases, “spontaneous” cases of subdural haematoma, unexplained bleeding disorders, and with the catch-all notion of “failure to thrive.”
"Failure to thrive," which I've written about before, is impossible to prove from a medical standpoint. Short, or small people tend to have small or short children- there's no failure to thrive, merely a genetic trait passed from parent to child... but in the eyes of the ideologues, there is some nefarious intent on behalf of the parents- who, logically, have no more control over it then they do over the national economy. But the ideologues know better than to let a good crisis go to waste. In the early 1970's the mainstream media began reports on "the epidemic of child abuse that gripped America."
“The Battered-Child Syndrome” paper of 1962 was followed in 1968 by a book similarly titled, The Battered Child, authored by Dr. Ray E. Helfer, the pediatrician who later founded the Helfer Society. His mentor Dr. C. Henry Kempe co-edited the book.
Dr. Kempe went on to found the National Center for the Prevention and Treatment of Child Abuse and Neglect in 1972.
Congress passed the bipartisan federal Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA), or the “Mondale Act,” in 1974 which gave birth to the agency known as Child Protective Services (CPS).
The practice of Medical Kidnapping had begun, but the public remained largely unaware for decades.
There is not, and never has been, a consensus among all qualified, expert doctors with regards to Shaken Baby Syndrome, metabolic bone conditions, vaccines, or child abuse diagnosis. This is all due to the bias of two doctors with something to prove- now it's taught in medical schools across the country as "medical fact," even though many specialists disagree.
Based on their own ideas and biases, they wrote what later became the policies for the American Academy of Pediatrics for “recognizing” child abuse. These policies have been communicated with social workers, law enforcement, media, and the courts, and have been implicated in the medical kidnapping of thousands of children from innocent parents. There have been many dissenting voices from medical experts over the past several decades, but the Child Abuse Pediatricians and the Helfer Society have worked to malign them and reduce their opposing interpretations to irrelevance. Like the global warming hoax this is nothing more than political science. When medicine or science becomes politicized, it throws the doors wide open for corruption.
The American Academy of Pediatrics’ Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect (AAPCCAN) is made up of Child Abuse Pediatricians. Dr. Cannell addresses the committee’s guidelines for evaluating such children:
However, common sense questions still need answering regarding the medical diagnosis: Why would abusive parents repeatedly bring their infant to the emergency room? How can trauma severe enough to fracture bones not leave a bruise? Why wouldn’t such chest trauma severe enough to fracture ribs not result in lung damage?
Additional questions need answering: Wouldn’t parents who abuse their infant severely enough to cause multiple fractures show evidence of psychopathology? Why do all eyewitnesses to parental behavior report the parents were concerned and loving?
Are members of AAPCCAN impartial experts or do they almost always testify for the state?
I had a personal experience with these people myself. When my daughters were 8 & 6 they were diagnosed with a labial adhesion making it difficult and incredibly painful to urinate. We had a wonderful Ob/Gyn doctor who wanted me to come in the room while she examined the girls. Now there are things in this world that I just do not want to see- and my daughter's privates are WAY up on that list. I declined saying that if an emergency arose my wife would instruct me. They had an issue on a weekend and my wife took them to the emergency room where one of these maniacs tried to accuse me of sexual abuse- he said it was impossible for both girls to have that disorder. We got the OB/Gyn on the phone and she absolutely read this idiot the riot act threatening to sue him herself. My advice to any parent that brings their child to the emergency room... Bring a lawyer!
http://medicalkidnap.com/2018/11/16/has-the-u-s-become-a-medical-police-state-how-doctors-deny-due-process-to-kidnap-children-through-cps/