OMFG, your post is literally just plagiarized from this post.
https://flatearthdata.com/empirical-evidence
I've done FAR FAR more research on both flat earth and globe earth than you have, obviously. And your fact checking on who becomes a flat earther is just as horrible as your fact checking about the flat earth! Poorly researched, no objective measurements as evidence of your claims, and simply dishonest.
It's literally delusional and narcissistic to think that everyone who researches it becomes a flat earther. I belong to a group of HUNDREDS of globers who HAVE researched it and find it utterly laughable and ridiculous.
Again, you have an already falsified and untestable hypothesis that does not and cannot explain ANYTHING we observe in nature. Your 'proofs' are entirely debunked and ridiculous.
Your 15 proofs are basically cut and pasted from Eric Dubay.
When you get a MODEL that can predict... well, ANYTHING at all... let me know, because then you will have a testable hypothesis. But you don't. You have a ton of ignorance and nothing else.
You CANNOT declare the flat earth a fact UNTIL and UNLESS you have a model to test. It's an UNTESTABLE HYPOTHESIS. And there is a reason you can't create a model and will not address it... because it's impossible and you know damned well it is.
So, go ahead and get a model and get back to the world... oh, and stop lying. Lots of people research flat earth and reject it. Stop using ridiculous cult tactics that give you a sense of importance.
Your proof are ridiculous.
A. I just showed you the curvature and you simply deny it. The planes fit the curvature calculator perfectly.
B. They do
C. Why would they? They CONSTANTLY adjust and adjusting 1 degree every 8 minutes or so would be completely unnoticeable. ONE DEGREE every 8 minutes. Irrelevant.
D. North is NOT UP.
E. No, they can't. See the video of the oil rig above. I can provide you a hundred videos of ships zoomed in that are still obscured by the horizon. DO YOUR RESEARCH.
F. Your denial of gravity does not mean is has not been proven. It VERY MUCH has Again, DO YOUR RESEARCH and stop parroting
G. No, it doesn't. Stop parroting and measure it yourself
H. Sure... we don't live on a beachball. Go up over 60,000 feet and with a wide FOV, you can JUST begin to see it. 100,000 feet and you'll be able to just barely start to measure it with a camera.
I. No evidence for this. Just parroting. I thought you said don't trust other people and you have to see for yourself. Oh, I guess that is only if you advocate a globe. YOU can parrot it when someone tells you ships captains have difficulty navigating in the southern hemisphere, no fact checking or personal experience needed!
Ps. I took a cruise from Buenos Aires to Valparaiso, Chile and there are dozens of boats that do. No problems noted by any of them. Ever. Your claim is ridiculous and you have no evidence to back that up. Silly.
J. Showing CONNECTIONS and on a FLAT MAP is totally dishonest. Direct flight work fine on a globe. Use DIRECT flights and use a GLOBE to do it, not a flat map.
K. Things would lean ONE DEGREE for every 70 miles. We don't live on a beachball.
L. No evidence for this. Trusting the claims of other people without fact checking I see.
M. Speculation and silliness. Just parroting.
N. Your denial of these images does not negate their authenticity.
O. No, they don't. Parroting and nonsense. Explain why the constellations change throughout the year and why stellar parallax and the eatvos effect exist.
Go join an astronomy club. Get some education. Stop parroting. Have you ever even LOOKED at the sky with a telescope? Gone to both hemispheres? Done star trails? Measured stellar parallax? Seen 17 hour days in the southern hemisphere?
I highly doubt it. Your model is impossible and ridiculous.
RE: 1