Dude - I'm not sure you can use a principle of pledge to seduce the IRS into a negligiability of reduction, but hey!
The prisoner's dilemma is subtle, it is our prison. The dilemma in non-aggresion assumes the other also assumes. I espouse the principle to you, the more so if you subscribe, but am I really in for it? What coin did we spend, what blood did we share?
As I know you're a believer, in your prison, a true believer, I have you, in my prison. Is that what you wanted with your principle?
RE: Daily post #43 in a 50 part series leading up to April 1, 2017