When you draw or paint a tree, you do not imitate the tree; you do not copy it exactly as it is, which would be mere photography. To be free to paint a tree or a flower or a sunset, you have to feel what it conveys to you: the significance, the meaning of it. Jiddu Krishnamurti
A lot of people write something and think it is pure. When in fact it is tainted with the slur of deception. It becomes a lie immediately when the context is slanted to say the same thing but posted in a different direction.
If I wrote "East" and you wrote "West" is that original? Does the balance of prose become any less an infringement when it is demised in a mere change of copy sense? Do you consider it a copyrightable text when it is nothing more than plagiarism of another's discourse migrated to another form but relating the very same opine?
Is using large words or miffing a phrase with padded verbiage a copy or an original?
Think about it.