Fellow Computeers!
We are all united around one goal: to put our machines and energy behind a good cause. What better cause than science? What better platform than a decentralized blockchain?
However, not all is roses and sunshine. As you know, there have been some issues with a recently white-listed project (SourceFinder). The project has been unable to issue work units in a timely and fair fashion. As a result, the magnitude calculations have become biased: workers who worked relatively little on this project are getting huge magnitudes because there are no new work units being issued. They are getting buckets for no work while the rest of us have to toil away for every coin.
A new poll has been created to decide if SourceFinder should be de-listed. While the majority of the workers are voting in favor of the removal, we notice a considerable vote share that supports the current state of affairs. We would like to bring to your attention the origin of these vote shares; in other words, we ask: Where did the keep SourceFinder voters make their magnitudes?
While all this is public information, we believe it is an insight into the mindset that plagues some of those among our ranks. Let us strive for higher virtues!
dgm17 (43% of the keep SourceFinder vote ) from United States of America
Total MAG: 463
SourceFinder MAG: 398
SourceFinder RAC: 3631
Gallifrey (22% of the keep SourceFinder vote) from United States of America
Total MAG: 179
SourceFinder MAG: 162
SourceFinder RAC: 1480
HammersThor (14% of the keep SourceFinder vote) from Mongolia
Total MAG: 136
SourceFinder MAG: 106
SourceFinder RAC: 973
DorGer (10% of the keep SourceFinder vote) from Germany
Total MAG: 107
SourceFinder MAG: 105
SourceFinder RAC: 965