Once again I'm in the strange position of being able to do something that people say can't be done. This is an example of the cognitive dissonance I'm faced with on a daily basis.
On one side there is a loud, vocal, articulate, scientifically-literate group of people who campaign against homeopathy, saying it's implausible/impossible/fraud/a delusion/placebo/dangerous. They'll use any means to try and reduce the reputation of, and people's access to, homeopathy. Often we see them claiming homeopathy is ineffective and yet somehow dangerous in the same sentence. Surely if it is 'utterly ineffective with no possible mechanism of action to effect a biological system', then it can't be 'dangerous', nor should you be campaigning so forcefully to have it banned and restricted? Something is very 'off' with that logic!
On the other side is my observed reality where I see homeopathy working powerfully and doing things nothing else can. Over and over again.
My cause is not helped by the under-funded and often ineffective homeopathic organisations seeming inability to build a solid evidence base. I'm just one person with a THOUSAND cases of treating autism under my belt, surely collectivthey should have built an overwhelming case for homeopathy by now?!
This morning's case: Boy, 4 years old. Diagnosed with Autism. After his first prescription, a vaccine detox lasting 8 weeks, his mum reports clear physical signs of detox; runny nose/sneezing throughout, frequent fevers at night, skin rashes breaking out, followed by massive improvements: He can now point to things for first time, functional language has just started (!), he now has eye contact and responds to his name, 'stimming' behaviour like spinning in circles continuously has decreased 70%, has intonation in his voice now to express emotions, can now ride a bicycle, much more 'in the world', can sleep peacefully (before he repeatedly sang nursery rhymes to get the sleep.
These are all incredible improvements in only 8 weeks.