Flu Vaccine Insert Says Safety Is Not Established In Pregnant Women
You would think they'd have lots of scientific data to support the safety of vaccinating pregnant women. The truth is, they don't! Don't believe me? All you have to do is read the vaccine package inserts from the manufacturers and they will tell you.
As you see in the photo above, the manufacturer of this vaccine tells you straight up "safety and effectiveness of FLUVIRIN® have not been established in pregnant women, nursing mothers, or children less than 4 years of age." The FLUVIRIN® vaccine isn't the only one that hasn't been shown to be safe either. None of them have.
No Flu Vaccine Is In Pregnancy Category A
American law requires certain drugs and biological products that are given to pregnant women to be categorized in a pregnancy category. See the chart below.
The chart above shows that only things in the pregnancy Category A have been shown to be safe in human studies. Guess how many of the flu vaccines are in Category A? None of them! So while the CDC tells us it's safe for pregnant women, there's not adequate science to support that. Otherwise, the flu vaccines would be Category A.
In the same vaccine insert it says "There are, however, no adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women."
If there are no adequate well-controlled studies, why is the CDC saying "there is a large body of scientific studies that supports the safety of flu vaccine in pregnant women and their babies?"
I'm sure if there actually were a large body of scientific studies showing it's safe to inject pregnant women with a flu vaccine the vaccine manufacturers would be glad to state that in their inserts. What, are they lying? Someone has to be! The CDC says there's lots of science to support vaccinating pregnant women with the flu shot but the manufacturers say there isn't. How could those two statements be so contradictory?
I think it's just a game of semantics. They have enough "science" for the CDC to recommend it, but to be safe the manufacturers admit the truth in their inserts that come with the vaccines. But who sees the inserts? Doctors and nurses, in best case scenarios. Pregnant mothers are virtually never given the inserts to read. Luckily, you can read them online.
A Look Into The Studies Supporting Vaccinating Pregnant Women
When you click on the CDC's link to the "large body of scientific studies" that support the safety of the flu vaccine in pregnant women you're taken to a page with 5 studies on it. Is that the large body of studies they're referring to? Where are the rest? If there's truly large bodies of scientific studies why would the manufacturers say there isn't?
Let's take a closer looks at some of those studies.
In the video above I show you that at least one of those studies was financed by the pharmaceutical giant GlaxoSmitKline, who happens to produce their own flu vaccine. And the same guy who received the funding (Dr. Naleway) was involved with most of the studies mentioned.
Also, the studies the CDC is linking to were subcontracted by the CDC. That's far from non-biased research. The CDC actually profits from selling vaccines. And the people on their advisory boards usually have a conflict of interest. It's important to keep this in mind when assessing their questionable science.
Another thing I noticed when briefly looking into the studies they link to is that Frank DeStefano was one of the authors of one of the studeis. Frank DeStefano was the co-author of the fraudulent 2004 study used as research to show that there is no link between vaccines and autism. Another co-author of that study, William Thompson, has recently admitted that the data actually showed a correlation and the CDC purposely manipulated the data to hide the link. This is the big story that was exposed in the Vaxxed documentary. DeStefano was asked about it in an interview and even admitted to doing it. Here more about this story here. So credible are these studies the CDC is linking to support the safety of vaccinating pregnant women with the flu shot?
CDC Fraud Recently Uncovered
A recent report details the the new findings of more of the fraudulent science used as research the deny the link between vaccines and autism. That report tells us that not only is a lot of the other science used to deny the link between vaccines and autism fraudulent, but the CDC was complicent in covering up the fraud. One of the main persons involved, Poul Thorsen, even stole money that was meant for autism research. He was indicted and has been a fugitive ever since!
Between Thorsen and DeStefano, that's two people who knowingly committed fraud to deny the link between vaccines and autism, all with the CDC's help! Nevertheless, to this day the CDC still stands behind the so-called science and uses it to dispute any link between vaccines and autism.
Paul Thorsen's fraud specifically regarded thimerosal, the mercury-based preservative still used in most of the flu shots given. So that means that the CDC has already been found complicit in fraud involving the safety of the flu vaccine. Yet we're still supposed to trust them? Learn more about this recent development here and in the video below.
The Thimerosal Controversy
The use of thimerosal has been controversial for quite some time now. In fact, it became so controversial that they removed it from childhood vaccines, giving the public the perception that it was removed from all vaccines. However, thimerosal is still in the #1 selling vaccine - the flu shot.
Ethylmercury vs Methylmercury
The CDC says that thimerosal is safe because of the type of mercury it is. Thimerosal is basically ethylmercury, whereas the mercury in the air, water, and fish is methylmercury. Methylmercury is well known to be a neurotoxin. The CDC assures us that ethylmercury is safe because it's cleared from the body faster than methylmercury. Just like with aluminum, they overlook the fact that eating mercury is different from being injected with it. Of course something will be excreted faster if it's injected. If eaten, the body has to digest it before it can be excreted. When injected, it bypasses the body's detoxification filters and enters straight into the bloodstream. Who cares how fast it's excreted? What matters is how much damage it does to the body before it's excreted.
While there's a good amount of science showing methylmercury to be toxic, there's surprisingly little scientific data regarding the toxicology of ethylmercury (thimerosal).
The FDA's Risk Assessment of Thimerosal
It may come as a shock to you to find out that the FDA considers ethylmercury to be as risky as methylmercury. The image below is from the FDA's website, and it not only tells you that they consider ethylmercury to be as risky as methylmercury, but they also tell you they're "lacking definitive data on the comparative toxicities of ethyl- versus methylmercury."
In Conclusion
Though the CDC confidently says it's safe to give pregnant women the flu vaccine, the people that produce the flu vaccines say that the vaccines' safety hasn't been established. Also, the FDA considers the ethylmercury from thimerosal, which is in the flu vaccine, to be equally as toxic as methylmercury, which is well known to be toxic. That's why pregnant mothers are discouraged from eating fish.
Plus, at least some of the CDC's science used to support the safety of vaccinating pregnant women with the flu vaccine was funded by a pharmaceutical company that profits from selling a flu vaccine. So there's a definite conflict of interest there. And it's possible that there's a conflict of interest in all of the science they cite. I just didn't look that deep into it. But I'd guess that if you follow the money you'd find out that their "science" is more like marketing and cost of doing business.
The CDC is lying about the safety of the flu vaccine. And they've been involved with major fraud in the past, which is finally catching up to them. Many of the largest pharmaceutical companies have even plead guilty to fraud in criminal court. So we're literally dealing with fraudulent companies and organizations that have a wide open revolving door between each other, such as former director of the CDC Julie Gerberding leaving the CDC to head pharmaceutical giant Merck's vaccine division, as well as holding millions of dollars in their stock.
Unfortunately, far too many people just blindly take the CDC's word for the safety of injecting pregnant women with a form of mercury that's hardly had any toxicological testing. Our children are sicker than ever. 1 in 6 of them have a developmental disability and autism has skyrocketed in the last couple decades, which coincidentally happens to coincide with the same time the number of vaccines in the schedule (which has never been tested) tripled, and the pharmaceutical companies were granted immunity from lawsuits.
Our precious babies and future generations depend on us. Please share this with others because the mainstream media relies on pharmaceutical ads for their revenue so they won't.