I don't get it...
By the same standard we all work, die at it and pay taxe that we never been given the choice.
We are not to make work something bad because there is risk.

There is risk everywhere. You living is a risk for others by the simple fact you impact others. If you go and play tennis, recognize that the game is rigged, don't blame the physics that affect the ball. I see the relation of authority to state in the way of the "choice" you are looking for.

If the GOVERNMENT make public policies forcing you into something, they have good reasons for it. The cost benefit as been establish. Its the priority of your leaders to balance the book, through the fraud they also put forward. It still need to balance.

If you are looking for the simple philosophical right to now not vaccinate yourself. Its one thing. If you come across a system based on risk assessment and public health... for the damaged ones, many more will avoid damages. Its a numbers game. Now look at this, its slightly out of context but, somewhere down there it connects. Look how robots will soon take the road. I can garantee you that the same calculation will be made for insurance purpose; humans will not be driving anymore as they will be to expensive and far less cost effective. You will look at the stats of humans dying from robots driving. Yet the numbers will have gone drastically down, justifying the death of others.

Did I mention you live in a world of commerce and liabilities?