They have done it before and they are doing it again - the media silent on whether the newly infected school students in Perth, Australia, were vaccinated for measles during the campaign or not. But I am asking in my blog: http://www.ernestdempsey.com/australia-3-more-students-catch-measles-even-after-vaccination-campaign/.
The news sources say a free vaccination campaign was run at the school after the outbreak of measles there. Yet the sources are quiet on how many of the infected students were unvaccinated. They are, however, trying to blame an unvaccinated student of the school, a 10-year-old, who visited Italy and returned with measles.
But did he catch measles from another vaccinated person in Italy or an vaccinated one? There is no info included on any of that.
The reason behind the quiet on vaccination status of infected students is obvious - every vaccinated child/person catching the infection presents a case against the narrative that the vaccine is effective. Imagine if the 3 newly infected students turn out to be vaccinated (which I personally suspect is the case), what will the credibility of the media selling measles shots?
Time to think.
