My View on Climate Change Part 5

For years now something has been bugging me about the official story of the Woolly Mammoth. Watch the video to find out my thoughts and what they have to do with climate change.

Do you notice something strange about the above thumbnail?

It is a cool picture of the Woolly Mammoth of course but what is it supposed to eat? The landscape is consistent with what we would expect the ice age arctic to look like but isn't consistent with the biological needs of an animal that size.

A ten thousand pound mammal with a trunk would need to eat a huge amount of food. The trunk would have been used to grab branches and long grasses not tiny little alpine like plants.

This is the mystery of the Mammoth and it isn't the only discrepancy that is easy to find, just one that is visual. In the video I cover my thoughts in greater detail but I thought I would include some of the material here in the article as well for those not able to watch or who want to do further research.

Could the Poles have Shifted?

Today

Before

Quotes from the CBC article with my commentary:

warmer So if during the Mammoths time the arctic was even colder and dryer then now, which you would expect in an Ice Age, how did plants grow at all? Yet we are supposed to believe they grew well enough to support 10,000 lb mammals?

Rapid Wait What? According to modern climate change theory, global temperatures never naturally increase at such a rapid rate. They have only done so recently due to humans increasing CO2 in the atmosphere.

Conclusion:

Something about the official story of the mammoth doesn't smell right to me. It seems that modern theories about prehistoric animals are made to fit the existing mainstream climate model even when it makes no sense. Instead we should be looking at the climate model with suspicion. It is just a model after all. Perhaps it needs to be adjusted to fit the story told by the fossil record?