Courts consider my work with a circle saw my work.

Did you have a court trial? I guess I should read the transcript from the case before commenting.

If a person gave a prompt to an AI to create a pattern and used the pattern to create a physical thing; then the person would own the thing, but not the pattern.

The pattern was not created by the mind of the user. They just own the short prompt and the item.

If a person created a model and used AI to enhance the model; the person would have copyright to the model but not to the enhancement.

An AI assisted project might still be copyrightable.

Regardless, simply writing a prompt and getting an image produced by a machine is not creating a copyright worthy piece of art.

!PIZZA