This surely is SPAM!! I read through about the first half - you make some good arguments but nullify them with repetition and AI prose. This is making the case for someone to chose to follow the curation trail and only view posts that have not been downvoted. Is this your purpose - a False Flag?

True freedom is to take the curation for what it's worth: the stakeholders' opinion on posts. Currently it is over-weighted from the top stakeholders because once a post is downvoted then it will not be organically spread. The solution: Empower the users to disregard and even negatively weight curation from accounts they chose. Enough sensible users adopt this then posts can grow organically again.

Blurt has its own space to prove. We'll see. Hive account@drutter : what is your take on this effort? I liken it to when every other post had a long reply from gangstalking that said the same thing. I am including Blurt in my cross-social application because I believe it has potential with a user base fed up with downvote censorship.