Yep, that’s the truth — token value is driven by actual utility within the ecosystem, not by branding. Without meaningful use cases, stronger economic incentives or improved network functionality, a new name doesn’t change the underlying dynamics. Hive needs structural improvements, not cosmetic adjustments.
And to be fair, there are projects already pushing the ecosystem forward — for example Magi, which is introducing new mechanics, new infrastructure and new economic layers that Hive didn’t have before. That’s the kind of progress that actually changes the fundamentals, not a rebrand.
RE: Support for Hive Rebrand (In Principle)