As always, your scholarly erudition is revealed in the deep content of your posts. I am always edified by your historical knowledge and research.

"...populist Thomas Jefferson argued that the United States needed a publicly-owned central bank so that European monarchs and aristocrats could not use the printing of money to control the affairs of the new nation. However, larger forces were set in motion which favored a privately owned central bank for the new nation."

What force could be larger than the population of the American nation at that time? Money. By corrupting the individual agents of government, such as Hamilton, the Rothschilds corrupted the government to act against the wishes and interests of the population, exactly as they continue to do today. It is not a larger force, but a covert and overwhelming force when targeted and applied to the weak points of government, the individuals acting as agents of the government. This is the entire purpose of government, to enable those agents to consolidate and apply the interests of the population using government to achieve their common interests that the crude technology of the day made impossible for the population to themselves coordinate and implement across the geographical breadth of the United States.

But that same power to consolidate and implement the desires and needs of the entire population also caused corrupting such agents of government to betray and supplant the sovereignty of the entire population, just as we see ongoing today. Hamilton was a traitor, and is properly vilified by free people today that understand the insidious effect of corruption on government. Sadly, most people either do not have the intellectual capacity to understand such corruption, remain nescient of it, or are themselves corrupt and maliciously promote it. Only a minority of people are smart enough to understand, educated enough to know, and morally competent to withstand corruption on the scale that has been necessary to destroy American freedom and turn the country into an open air prison, a corral for chattel psychopathic banksters can milk for profit and rule over as overlords do, instead of being relegated to equality with their peers as a free society depends on.

"...Hive account@valued-customer wrote about the background of the birth of the Republican Party and the Democratic Party in the United States!"

In fact this is not correct. Neither the Democratic nor the Republican parties existed at the time the revolution created the United States government.

"Nine years after the Constitution was written, first US president George Washington used his famous Farewell Address to warn against American political parties. For better or worse, political parties sprang up just a few years later and have been a major part of the American political landscape ever since."

https://www.thecollector.com/evolution-of-american-political-parties/

At it's outset, the USA was non-partisan. The political parties of the English Monarchy were inapplicable to the revolutionary country created by rebellion against the English government, in which those political parties operated. The Tories and Whigs of English politics were responses to the specific English government extant at the time, and were clearly seen as inadequate and only rebellion able to secure the rights and authority of free men because of that inadequacy.

Sadly, political parties are a noxious influence on government, resulting in that inadequacy that necessitated rebellion to justly secure the rights and authority of free men, which incompetence they cause and sustain today. When they did arise, American political parties effected to corrupt and betray the American people through subterfuge, deception, and covert graft and bribery of individual agents acting on behalf of constituencies. This same suite of duplicity continues today, and demonstrates that representation cannot fulfill the mandate imposed by government, no matter the intent or excellence of the Constitution upon which government is founded.

Pieces of paper can neither impose rule, nor sustain it against bribery. It is fallible and weak meat puppets that must do both, and experience has shown men can do neither. Lysander Spooner showed that the Constitution had failed to create just government prior to the Civil War, and his exemplary discussion is no less valid after that utter negation of just governance that war is.

Fortunately we have advanced technologically today, and dispersed populations no longer are incompetent to discuss and decide on policy, neither are prevented from ascertaining budgetary requirements or personally contributing to funding them. Hive demonstrates all of these technological capabilities extant today. Free people no longer need to depend on independable representatives to effect governance today, no longer must suffer unpreventable corruption of government by banksters, and must undertake to govern themselves to fulfill their responsibility to effect their authority, and duty to their peers and posterity to govern justly and competently. Representative democratic mechanisms may have been the most advanced political technology available in the 18th Century, but they are utterly obsolete today, and free men abnegate their sacred duty by remaining dependent on them instead of effecting personally that just governance they are responsible to implement.

History shows that every form of government is incompetent to the task. By necessarily depending on individuals to act as agents representing populations, governments are ubiquitously and inevitably corrupted as those individual agents are incompetent to withstand the corporate wealth and power that is always brought to bear on their feeble human beings, and no man can withstand the power of many men to defend himself, nor others, either in military contests, nor any other which pits the collective power of many against the individual fortitude of one. Every form of collective government previously conceived and able to be implemented has been proved incapable of producing just and lawful governance, which is impossible because of the inadequacy of agents representing populations to withstand the wealth and power of corporations.

What is shown is that free men rule themselves. There is no such thing as Anarchy, because anything, even men, that are not ruled simply proceed to be subject to and effect forces randomly. Governance is necessary to human existence, and is not lacking to us naturally as a result of that necessity. Each of us rules ourselves. We are in actuality Autarchs and live in an association of autarchies that mutually agree on restraint and action that are necessary to effect civil society. As peers we take the counsel of our neighbors and communities and agree to act in mutual respect of each the others' sovereign rights to implement each our several responsibilities that create the blessings of civilization. Them as fail to do so are incompetent to civil society, and are necessarily prevented from inclusion in it, whether through banishment, imprisonment, or death, as required by the particular circumstances applicable.

While it is not simple nor easy to undertake to implement such just governance as must be, the fact is that there is not any substitute that can suffice, and necessity therefore mandates ineluctably that free men must themselves personally undertake Autarchy and just jurisdiction mutually of civil society, or suffer the lack of it, with all attendant miseries and deprivations attendant thereto of barbarity, brutality, and rude animal wilderness that is the only alternative. Enslavement to overlords is unacceptable, and history shows enslavement inevitably precedes genocide, as is demonstrably ongoing today. Subjugating ourselves, our communities, and our posterity to genocide utterly fails to meet our personal responsibility to defend our lives, communities, and beloved sons and daughters. It is even worse than mere animal wilderness, where individuals might luckily avoid being consumed by roaming predators or gangs of thugs by mere random chance, because the coordination of predation by corporations designed to maximize the profit to stakeholders excludes random chance through the competence of collective industry, such that no happy lucky man or men might survive through mere chance.

We cannot simply return to a state of nature, nor is that preferable to just governance, despite the false claims of them stupid or misinformed enough to recommend it. Predatory corporations make that impossible. We cannot submit to overlords and be enslaved, because that provably results in genocide, which fails to effect our personal responsibilities to ourselves, our communities, and our posterity to preserve our lives, fortunes, and beloved families. The only other choice is to rule ourselves and jointly regulate our acts, exactly as Providence and the laws of the natural universe provide and demand. Where previously we have been incompetent to discuss and decide amongst ourselves at regional and global scale, happily technology has advanced and facilitated that power to each and all of us individually. Nothing and no one can prevent our good and just execution of our responsibilities and duties to govern ourselves and justly associate with one another by mutual agreement, and it's about God damned time we got off our lazy asses and did so.

Thanks!