"East Asian historians like me claim that that era was the birth of the first feminism in America!
"I don’t know if my respected senior would agree with that fact!"
You are perceptive. Feminism as I understand it began in the late 1800's, after reconstruction had reformed the South and the Gay 90's created a surge in wealth for oligarchs that markedly left the poor behind. Many social movements surged in response to the rise in GINI, and American governments transformed in the effort to suppress them and protect the sybaritic wealth of the oligarchy.
"...Laura Elizabeth Ingalls Wilder (February 7, 1867 – February 10, 1957)..."
Wilder almost perfectly exemplifies the rise of Feminism after the Civil War in America. 'The Little House on the Prairie' reveals the power of family and the basis for civil society being undermined by Feminism, and prophecies the same foundation of strong families that will underlie the post-imperial survivors after the coming collapse necessarily becoming independently productive in a network of similarly strong productive families. Wilder lived in exactly the era in which American Empire burgeoned, and died immediately prior to the zenith of that empire, after which Feminism, Israel, and other similarly parasitic social movements hollowed it out and consumed it from within, leading to the present final collapse in progress.
As I think the zenith of the American Empire ended with the assassination of JFK in 1963, and we have been living through the decline to what appears to be the final destruction of the American Empire today, Feminism has in many ways been a knife in the back of empire and has taken much of the power in that empire which has been actively used to destroy it, so the early 1960s represents a shift in which Feminism was unleashed to eat the source of it's power, as typically marks declining empires. Such social movements are reactions to injustice. Their entire raison d'etre is the unfair power of the oligarchy that drives empire, and as the empire is defeated from within by such movements their power grows until it destroys the empire, and then, deprived of their raison d'etre, the source of their power, such movements die with the empire. The final days of the American Empire are the zenith of Feminism, but Feminism is not going to replace the American Empire, and deprived of it's source of power and responsible in large degree for the collapse that follows the destruction of the empire, Feminism will be blamed, rightly, for the coming interregnum and the horrors that typically eventuate as power vacuums beget conflict, and will vanish with greater speed than even the remnants of imperial power as former Feminists pretend they never supported it to prevent suffering the just consequences of their betrayal.
"...they demanded equal wages and working conditions with men in society!"
They demanded the destruction of the family, and the power that women had underlying the rise of the American Empire was destroyed by Feminism and they instead took the power that men had, which they have done so successfully that by almost every metric Feminists have taken most of the power of men in America. They earn more, they graduate from college more, they own more houses, vote more, and wield more political power. These are the twists of the knife in the back of empire that precipitate their own destruction as destroying the family and the natural roles men and women fill inevitably destroy the society that empowers empire. In the wreckage of society after imperial collapse the fundamental natural mechanism of family will become absolutely necessary to survival, and any that cannot rapidly adapt will perish in the economic void during the brutality of the interregnum. All the mechanisms Feminists have used to destroy society and parasitize production in the empire will become useless when the empire collapses. Actual productivity will be necessary to survival, and any that do not immediately become strong families will be left with nothing. Most women in the West are too old to form strong families and without the welfare programs by which they parasitized productive men, they will die, rightly blamed for their own demise.
JFK's 'noble family' was a fabrication, like all nobility. His father Joseph was a mobster that profited from Prohibition and purchased public relations to create that blatantly false impression of nobility - like all nobility does. Any close look at the history of every nobility reveals the truth, that such families are the least noble and most brutal, larcenous, and parasitic of all. Nobility is an inherent feature of centralization, and will be eradicated as decentralization out competes centralization going forward. JFK knew that the American Empire was being threatened, and correctly identified Israel as the worst threat to American Empire. His death represents the moment when Israel, and it's allied parasitic social movements like Feminism, Racism, and Sexualism, defeated the American Empire, and since then the decline of America has been implemented by the rise of Israeli power, as they consumed the power of America and thereby increased the power of Israel.
I strongly recommend Kim Iversen's interview of Professor Jiang to gain an understanding of the turmoil that will follow the military defeat of Usrael by Iran and the subsequent conquest of the ME that will follow the ejection of Usrael and it's replacement by BRICS. The parallels between Trump and Justinian, whom presided over the destruction of Byzantium, are striking, and the role of Khazaria in that imperial collapse is equally mirrored by Israel today. I believe Jiang wrongly predicts Israel will become a world power after America's collapse, for the same reasons that Feminism will not become a world power after America's collapse. All it's power is derived from parasitizing the empire, and the collapse of the empire will eradicate it's power. This happened with Khazaria, with the Hyksos that precipitated the collapse of Egypt, and even the Sumerian Empire similarly subsumed by Akkadian immigrants. It likely occurred in the Americas as the Phoenicians undermined Precolumbian American empires, albeit without surviving historical documentation due to the destruction of historical documents by Jesuits that also attempted to do the same in the West, at that time.
What will replace the current parasite riddled hollow shell of the former American industrial powerhouse will be the new BRICS industrial powerhouse, that will demonstrate the same vigor as all rising imperial powers must have to rise to power. But there is a fundamental change occurring in industry today that has not been part of history, and that is decentralization of the means of production being the leading edge of technological advance. Decentralizing production necessarily decentralizes every economic metric. Little is more obvious than the military transformation that decentralization has wrought on the battlefields of the world today. The defeat of the US Navy by the Houthis seems incredible to people unaware that decentralization of means of production out competes centralized production, and nothing better reveals this than the victory of Yemen over the US Navy in the Bab al Mandeb.
It is for this reason I am striving to adopt decentralized means of production while these industrial tools are inexpensive and ubiquitous. Because of this clinal boundary that is ongoing, BRICS will only temporarily appear to inherit the mantle of America as the hegemon of the world, until centralization is parasitized by decentralization of industry, and the economic balance of power necessarily follows. Hive uniquely demonstrates the last gasp of centralization coming, as it falsely claims to be decentralized, but is actually completely centralized. An oligarchy runs Hive with 100% of the political power attained by >50% of the stake on the platform. This oligarchy claims to have decentralized the jurisdictions in which it operates, but almost all of it's code is running on the cloud, the actual jurisdiction of the tech oligopoly in which Hive exists. >90% of the economic power represented by Hive tokens is claimed by the Hive oligarchy, and, just like the traitorous social movements Feminism and Israel that have fatally parasitized America, the oligarchy has hollowed out the user base of Hive, which I believe faces imminent collapse as a result of this deception and treachery today.
The internet itself is just a larger version of Hive, in fact. The imminent imposition of biometric ID to use the internet will not create a powerful digital empire, but destroy it. What will follow will be local networks owned by their users, such as Meshcore, that will grow rapidly to replace the collapsed unitary digital empire as the collapsed American empire can no longer support it, until these regional networks of decentralized user owned nodes intersect and combine into an actual decentralized web of networks that resists centralization, and the parasitization that inevitably succumbs to. In every field of industry, decentralization of the means of production will replace unitary centralized structures, and they will all be immune to parasitization, because people that own their own means of producing the blessings of civilization cannot be blackmailed, bribed, or bullied into selling their output to any centralized entity. That is selling themselves into slavery, which even morons can understand cannot profit them.
Chaos is a ladder. Empires cannot climb ladders because their Brobdingnagian mass cannot be supported on ladders. Only individuals can climb ladders, being lithe and lean. Because the laws of physics have mandated that decentralization of the means of production is the fundamental mechanism by which productivity can increase, individuals that adopt the decentralized means of production suitable to their circumstances will emerge from the coming chaos as the foundation of civilization in the new era that will create the clinal boundary between the old world and the new. Fundamental to that production will be posterity, as people that don't produce children die. Families are the ultimate decentralized means of production of mankind, and will be what survives Feminism, Sexualism, Zionism, and all the other parasitisms that have consumed the American Empire, and will suddenly be left with nothing to consume but BRICS, which they are not adapted to prey on. As centralization, which the BRICS exemplify, is out competed by decentralization, the surviving people of the world will prosper because they are the most productive, and inherently immune to parasitization.
Thanks!
RE: When was America's golden age?