In 1776, we "won" our independence from the King of England… not really.
The new govern-cement accepted the old debt, in exchange for sovereignty.
We just fought a war to escape tyranny and remove our shackles, and immediately put on new shackles.
View documents about how the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution for the United States of America were almost completely opposite in nature.
If we did the same thing, we will end up with the same result.
The structure of govern-cement is the problem. The people in that structure may be evil, but if we get rid of the people, new people will repopulate it, and be just as evil.
"They are a threat to our democracy"
How was such a sentence uttered when, they were talking about descenting voter opinions?
Well, the important thing is comprehending "our". It could be used to define the group of American voters. It could be used to describe the group of dumbocrap voters. It could describe the group of Elites [KM].
And yes, the Elites think that it is their democracy. They own it. Lock, stock and barrel. They own all the voting shares of The US.
Further, if we had fair elections and all that, democracy means rule by the majority.
And that is the worst case in almost all cases.
The average IQ person is the majority. The most easily motivated by propaganda. The least understanding of what the secondary ramifications of a law are. The least likely people to have done real soul searching to understand their demons, that they are voting into law. These people have the least skin in the game. So, it is not just a tyranny of the majority, it is often the worst majority.
So, if we want voting, and that voting to means something, we really need to build that into whatever we build anew.
"If voting changed anything, it would be illegal" - Emma Goldman
Making Govern-cement small
The less you need govern-cement, the smaller it will be.
We have let a group of Elite [KM] move us off farms and into cities, while they made us more and more dependent on govern-cement.
If we grow our own food, then we are much less reliant on govern-cement and many control systems they impose.
If we built our own stuff, then we are much less reliant on govern-cement and their regulations.
If we make our own electricity, then we are much less reliant on govern-cement and their restrictions.
The less you need govern-cement, the less you need to follow their edicts.
And this is the only real way to rid ourselves of govern-cement.
Stop needing it. Stop believing it. Stop reacting to it, and it just disappears.
Not a shot has to be fired.
This is one of those really weird things about duality and making actual changes.
What you resists, persists.
You can't kill the bad guys. If you are "fighting the bad guys", then there will always be bad guys. (it is one of the reasons why police officers are a stupid idea. Police men or peace officers are far better)
All the Elite [KM] go away when we ignore them into oblivion. Once we know who they are, and that they want our destruction, we stop listening to anything they say. We ignore anyone who takes their bribes. We ignore their ideas, their propaganda.
The only reason for shooting is to protect yourself from the Elite [KM] trying to force themselves upon you. Then you are shooting in self-defense. You are not resisting the idea you are holding in place, but you are getting rid of a direct threat. Or, basically, turning the duality thing back on them.
I believe their will be a lot of shooting, because we have a lot of people who have a lot of anger stored up in themselves. The problem is that 100s hack at the branches while only 1 attacks the root. And the Elite [KM] are very good at riling up people, and then getting out of the way of the bullets. Unfortunately, their names and faces will be known to the world, and there will not be a place they can go to get away from the business end of a rope.
Still, the real solution is to realize the rhetoric of evil, and ignoring it. Clearing these thoughts out of your mind.
Marx sounds really good, unless you understand the consequences of rhetoric. Then it sounds like stealing from others to feed yourself, because you are envious of other's ability to bake bread.
We have so much to learn about self-governance.
So much to discuss about better ways of voting / law making.
Like, if it is to be a general law, it needs to be passed by 90%.
If it isn't agreed upon by 90% of the people, then it isn't really a law. (if 90% aren't already doing it, then there is no way to enforce it)
So, we pass a law (like murder is bad m'kay) and then the law needs to go to the peace-keeping force to be voted on if they will enforce it. There are many good intentioned laws that are impossible to police, or just make things worse.
Why do we think that it is ok to pass a law by 51%?
And why don't we have a vote for whether a govern-cement agency continues existence?
Why don't we have multi-tiered voting? Voting for 1st place, and only first place, is so easily manipulated.
And why do we even have representatives anymore? With the internetz, we could discuss and pass laws ourselves, directly.
But more important than all this, if we go back to a type of tribal living, then the laws are really only of and by the tribe. The agreements between tribes only need to be about fair trade, and that becomes less and less as we are each more abundant. Then it is becomes mostly about dealing with bad actors.
None of this requires a fighting revolution. No shots have to be fired. Every homestead is a real nail in the coffin of govern-cement. The big institutions leading to total, global tyranny will crumble under their own weight.
That said, i feel a lot of pent up frustration will be let loose. Stay out of the way of those people. Don't go pew-pewing unless you know who the enemy is.