Why are we wasting so much of our brightest minds on finding dark matter and dark energy?
Because our modern materialistic science is built
on a complete fabrication, built
on a lie, built
on a false experiment, built
on theory that never really worked in all cases.
But, instead of saying, all of this stuff we have believed for years is now questionable, we worked really hard to make insane leaps of logic and develop the simple theories into unprovable nightmares.
So, those scientist trapped in modern materialistic science continue to try to prove gravity exists and is the thing that holds the universe together (also the big bang)
This defying of reality (evidence and data) has caused scientist pushing back to make such bold claims as:
Gravity Does Not Exist by Vincent Icke
The theory of gravity
An idea by Newton that mass attracts mass... supposedly discovered sitting under an apple tree.
We all know the story of the apple tree, but can many relate the thought experiments that this theory supposedly answered?
And then, an insane and very wealthy man supposedly figured out the gravitational constant.
He did an experiment, in a barn, with large balls suspended by a wire and using a telescope to measure fractions of a millimetre.
But this wasn't quite good enough
A fuzzy haired crackpot came up with a theory that it wasn't gravity that mass made, but a depression in space, and that caused things to "fall" towards each other. Which worked better, but not perfect.
Unfortunately a female astronomer, Vera Rubins, found that galaxies do not spin with the inner stars spinning faster than the outer stars. No, a galaxy spins like all the stars are glued onto a plate. The rotational velocity is the same for all the things we can see in a galaxy.
First scientists had to say Vera was wrong, however she spent a decade confirming her observation, so they had to go back to the drawing board.
Then scientists came up with Dark Matter and later Dark Energy to explain how gravity could still work.
... and then string theory, and....
Questionable observations of gravity
If gravity was a force in between masses than you would be able to hold a piece of paper up to the wall, and it would stay there, but it doesn't.
Gravity is so powerful it can hold all of the atmosphere to our planet, resisting the suck of the vacuum.
But it is so weak that people can dunk a basketball, and birds can fly.
Gravity also changes from spot to spot on the earth. (so much so that there is a scientist that believe micro black holes exists, and some are inside the earth's crust)
Gravity also changes depending on if it rained recently or not.
Imagine some water in a mountain changes your readings. When the mountain, and the water or lack thereof is much, much, much smaller than the earth. And so would have almost no impact on gravity.
A capacitor charged to a million volts loses weight
A capacitor charged to ten million volts floats.
A gyroscope spun up to really high RPMs loses weight.
Lots of things just do not add up when you believe that gravity is caused by mass.
Electric Universe Model
Today we have other theories which are far better at explaining what we see around us and in our solar system and our galaxy, but modern materialistic science will not let go of the theory of gravity.
The Electric Universe Model explains all kinds of things very accurately without the need for matter that we can't see and energy that we can't measure.
It explains our sun and what it does.
It explains the solar winds that go faster the further away from the sun you are.
It explains how you stay stuck to the ground, and not flattened to the ground.
It explains how the universe is stretched out in string like concentrations instead of an even dispersal that you would get if it was just gravity after the big bang.
It explains so much that you would think every scientist would be using it now.
But those scientists in their ivory towers refuse to acknowledge this model.
No, they continue to go further into convoluted theorems that have gotten so bad that they can never be proven.