It says, right there in the Scientific Method that one disproof throws out the entire theory. Then you start off at the beginning again.
So, why are the "top scientists" defending obvious falsehoods? The ivory tower hierophants should be the first to support the Scientific Method. However, instead of upholding truth, the instead bury it. Instead of searching for truth, they pretend that they already know everything. Can these people actually be called "scientists"?
Well, they call themselves "scientists", and keep anyone that disagrees with them away, shouting that they are not real scientists.
These creatures have held science back over a hundred years. And, if presented with ABSOLUTE PROOF, they would still hold onto the theories that they were indoctrinated with. They would hold onto their portraits of Einstein, when they all know Bohr won.
I was told in school, that scientists follow the facts wherever they lead
And then i learned of all the facts that Modern Materialistic Science has buried. Buried, and you are called a pseudo-scientists if you dare to ever bring up these things that have been relegated to the appendix of text books.
This is bad enough, but these hierophants also discount even looking into things because they have deemed it, "not real". Like ESP or NDE. Both of which have a lot of supporting data. However, it is all waved away without a 2nd glance. (well, it is more appropriate to say that it was never given a 1st glance)
However, if it is to support their "theories", then they will totally believe in things that don't exist, can't be shown to exist, and sometimes proven that they can't exist.
Such duplicity, in a field that is supposed to be all about the facts.
The Flimsiest of Evidence is enough for them
Most of the BIG experiments that are told about in science class, actually have very flimsy evidence, which is told to us to be iron clad. While experiments that contradict the current paradigm, well, no amount of evidence is enough.
The Michelson-Morley experiments which "proved" that the aether doesn't exist barely had enough measurements to be called an experiment. People have repeated the experiments and got different readings and different elevations, and this was just discounted by saying it was temperature.
Einstein's Theory of Relativity has very sparse evidence. Experiments that were only done once, and were extremely expensive where no one but the govern-cement could do it. The infamous one is that the Theory of Relativity predicted the orbit of Mercury 96% accurately. A lady astronomer has a theory that is 99.9999% accurate, with so much supporting evidence, but no one mentions it.
Kozyrev created many experiments, that anyone could do, however although these experiment were performed by so many and got the same results, the findings have just been ignored.
And so it goes throughout Modern Materialistic Science.
If all else fails, they just lie
The big bang is "all figured out", except for the part where something comes from nothing. Basically, the Modern Materialistic Scientists say, "give us one miracle, and then we can explain the rest." Which might be fine, except that they are trying to write God completely out of the equation. Kinda hard to say that God doesn't exist, and then turn around and say "God exists for just this moment".
And this is repeated all over biochemistry. They have a flow chart of how things happen… this turns into that, turns into that, AND THEN A MIRACLE HAPPENS, and viola, life.
Many of the experiments that are described in the Bible, i mean, the Science Text Books, looks like they never happened. No one can repeat them, but Modern Materialistic Science is based on them. From the measurement of objects attracting due to mass, to the god particle CERN saw once.
The ivory tower hierophants really should be honest enough to say that they cannot repeat an experiment.
Sorry for not listing more examples of each failure, but i would be here all day.
It really sucks when you are not afforded the same leeway they give themselves. Einstein is proven, but Kozyrev is not. This duplicity makes it impossible to advance science. Actually, it would be better to say that they shouldn't be giving any leeway, even if it is there favorite theory.
If scientists actually followed facts, the world would be a very different place today. We might have flying cars and free energy by now (well, at least out in the open). But what kind of world can we expect when the thing that is supposed to the bedrock of knowledge, the pillar of honesty is corrupt to the core, and supports lies?