To my mind, that kind of attitude would walk it's talk by stopping auto downvoting all of my posts - whether I talk about love, health or chocolate. Your actions are not aligned with your intent here.
To be honest, the fact that I still follow 's downvote trail is an oversight. I set that up some time ago, when I could still generally endorse the downvoting choices being made. Truthfully, I thought I had already disabled it by now after a discussion months ago; I appreciate your bringing it to my attention.
While I certainly do desire to chip in my DV power to support anti-abuse efforts (thus my initially following that trail), I've long had some trouble aligning with others on what exactly constitutes "abuse" here. Personally I loosely define it as any dishonest and/or systematic behaviour carried out to extract value from the rewards system.
I'm not making a statement on whether you do that or not, because frankly I don't read you much, haven't really looked personally into your following, who you vote, or who votes you, and I literally just don't know enough to even begin to make an informed, unbiased assessment.
Regardless, for as long as "disagreement with rewards" is an acceptable criterion for a downvote, I won't be following the DV trail.
RE: Are you supporting the top 20 witness who is publicly pushing for the exinction of the human race?