I don't have a case here. If you're talking about "abusive downvotes", I don't agree with everything azircon does, but we're on the same line regarding pool milking nutcases.
My Twitter profile header only triggers those who choose to, anyone else realizes it has to be sarcasm on a personal level. He has no idea what anything behind that means and writes a shitpost with silly unfunded accusations. That post gets $60 because rewards are declined, which is great for his visibility and shows how stupid censorship claims are.
This reminds me of good old dobartim times. Everybody wins!
RE: Are you supporting the top 20 witness who is publicly pushing for the exinction of the human race?