Speaking to a friend recently I asked them how did they know there was a pandemic. They answered because of the deaths, medically certified. However, what if the death tolls had been created artificially?
If we start from this position can we look at how deaths in England came not from Covid-19 but were due to other factors. The evidence points to a Catch-22 situation. Expecting many deaths from Covid-19 steps were taken that actually resulted in many more deaths. Although whether they derived from Covid-19 or not is debatable. If there was really a pandemic there should be no room for debate. There should be no evidence that points to death tolls being artificially inflated. But there is.
To get the whole plandemic off to a good start elderly people were moved from hospitals into care homes where many people died of Covid19, or at least that is what the death certificates stated. As if deliberately moving ill people from a hospital setting into care homes to be in proximity to elderly vulnerable people wasn’t bad enough; the evidence is in that the authorities took measures to actually hasten the deaths of these people. All under the guise of care and help. Predicting many deaths such as Imperial College London that predicted 40 million deaths back in March 2020 the British authorities took steps to administer euthanasia drugs which resulted in many deaths. This was then swept under the carpet by a death registration process that at every turn sought to minimise the involvement of professionals doing their usual duty.
The Coronavirus Act
This removed from the NHS their duty to abide by the National Framework, and thus allowed them to discharge people into care homes. Some 25,000 people were discharged in March and April 2020. This was deemed necessary to make room in the NHS for an expected flood of ill people with Covid-19. They even built Nightingale Hospitals. They were never used. Pressures on NHS services emanated more from staff having to self isolate then from corridors filled with sick people, supposedly from Covid-19.
Picutre showing NHS under crisis during the flu season of 2018
This policy of introducing elderly sick patients into care homes from hospital was not isolated to the UK. It happened throughout Europe and in the US, like in New York.
Whilst elderly people were moved from hospitals into care homes to free up hospital space that was never needed, there was at the same time a sharp withdrawal of care in these homes. Faced with a shortage of PPE, tests, and self isolation policies for staff, all serving to create chaos. Due to so many restrictions GP’s turned to video calls usually made with the carers.
As we’ve seen from the Lockdown Files, Matt Hancock, UK Health Secretary, rejected testing for those entering care homes from the community. This was despite advice and when he was also aware of the age stratification nature of the disease. Testing did not become a thing until August 14 2020. Why was this? Who steered this policy?
End of Life Protocols
In March/April 2020 British Funeral Director John O’Looney reported that he was seeing Midazolam syringes/vials in trash bins next to the deceased elderly patients he was collecting.
In care homes as people reach the end of their days there are medications that are routinely used to ease their passing. One of these is Midazolam and the other is Morphine.
- Midazolam is a short-acting injectable benzodiazepine with rapid onset that is commonly used in seizures, anesthesia and anxiety disorders. Midazolam is also known under the brand name Versed. It is most frequently used before surgeries or procedures to decrease anxiety, cause drowsiness, and help with anesthesia in patients who need tubes or machines to help them breathe.
A side effect of the drug is abnormally slow breathing, respiratory depression and respiratory arrest.
- Morphine is an opioid agonist used for the relief of moderate to severe acute and chronic pain. A side effect of morphine can be breathing problems.
Why did David Webb, England’s Chief Pharmaceutical Officer recommend this course of action, when supposedly Covid19 was already hampering the patients ability to breathe?
Even before the plandemic was officially announced the UK had been stockpiling Midazolam. Charts show a massive up-tick in use both in April 2020 and at the end of 2020. Both periods also coincide with a spike in reported deaths from Covid-19. We have a chicken and egg scenario here. Did they die from Covid-19 or from the drugs that are routinely given as euthanasia drugs to end life? Not only that, they are also routinely used at the doses recommended in the NICE guidance as part of the lethal injection delivered to prisoners in the US under the death penalty.
A sign there was some unusual activity occurring comes from the reported 17,316 patients who died with dementia and Alzheimer's recorded on their death certificates in England in April 2020. This was 3x the usual for this time of year.
The deaths from the care homes helped to shape the plandemic narrative that there was a deadly pathogen. Indeed it is highly questionable how many people died from Covid19, rather than just with, and even with is from a heavily flawed testing system.
Medically certified
Due to the lockdowns, for people dying in these care homes the Medical Certificate of Cause of Death (MCCD) process for Covid19 abolished the need for any examination at all. The scrutiny of a second medical opinion (Medical Examiner) was removed and in fact often times a medical practitioner was assigned the task of signing the certificate. There was no requirement for them to have even met the deceased. Video calls were deemed sufficient, and sometimes not even that.
As the Office for National Statistics stated;
The inclusion of a death in the published figures as being the result of Covid19 is based on the statement of the care home provider, which may or may not correspond to a medical diagnosis or test result…
These deaths were then fed into the daily running reports produced by the likes of the BBC, hyping up the plandemic. The running UK mortality total, as reported by the press, came from a mixture of sources. These included the NHS, the CQC, Public Health England, Public Health Scotland and various other statistical agencies.
This reporting grabbed the headlines, but was chaotic and meaningless from a statistical perspective. Benefiting from increased ratings they were happily reporting deaths that consistently promoted alarm.
Furthermore, as guidance from the Royal College of Pathologists shows there was a reluctance to perform autopsies to confirm these deaths were from Covid19 at all.
If a death is believed to be due to confirmed COVID-19 infection, there is unlikely to be any need for a post-mortem examination to be conducted and the Medical Certificate of Cause of Death should be issued.
In addition the Chief Coroner’s Office advised;
COVID-19 is a naturally occurring disease and therefore is capable of being a natural cause of death...The aim of the system should be that every death from COVID-19 which does not in law require referral to the coroner should be dealt with via the MCCD process.
Anyone getting a sense of Catch22?
Even the deceased’s family, who would normally be consulted in regard to the MCCD and who would consent to the cause of death, due to isolations and lockdowns, were replaced by anybody who was in charge of the body. This included funeral directors.
In fact the UK state also withdrew the standard second opinion required to cremate. This was suspended for all Covid deaths.
At each stage death was attributed to Covid-19 by a registration process that was special for Covid19 only. Due to the ‘special nature’ of the plandemic the UK state was able to bring in a process that allowed for each element to be a reduced form of ‘care’. From care homes deciding the cause of death, to the lack of involvement by doctors, medical examiners, coroners, funeral directors and the families themselves.
That all these things combined to increase Covid-19 deaths points to a conclusion that these changes were not incidental.
If we consider in England there were two distinct periods where excess mortality rose sharply.
One was around the beginning March/April 2020. it should be noted that it is unusual for a respiratory illness to occur outside of the winter period. This corresponds to the period when elderly people were effectively euthanised by giving them the drugs Midazolam and morphine. For those unaware that patients were being given euthanasia drugs this would appear like there was a pandemic unfolding.
The next spike of deaths occurred in the end of 2020 when we would expect an up tick in respiratoy illness, like flu. What was unusual in the end of 2020 was that whilst we once again see an increase in Midazolam being prescribed, we did not see the usual antibiotics being prescribed to assist people with a respiratory illness. There was in fact a 50% decrease in the prescribing of antibiotics compared to previous years. This again speaks to a withdrawal of care.
This withdrawal of care, was (suspiciously) extended to residents of care homes to the extent that DNAR notices (do not resuscitate) were attached to care plans without their knowledge or consent. All in the name of a deadly pandemic.
Still every death in a care home setting was generally reported as having been from Covid-19. But what if they weren’t? Whose purpose did it serve to inflate deaths and then report them as having been from Covid-19?
Even if we are generous and put this early 2020 shit show down to over-reaction and panic from incompetent politicians, can the same be said for the second wave at the end of 2020?
To even contemplate that Covid-19 was a lie from start to finish is to take a leap of unfaith! It is to accept that our erstwhile leaders do not actually have our best interests at heart. That the entire play was all about selling us a medical experiment. Looking at how events were manipulated makes me question if there even was a virus at all?
For a longer more in-depth read see the Daily Beagle article here
Dr John Campbell on Euthanasia in the Pandemic
Chris Martenson Midazolam Murders