The way we humans tend to "label" things has long been fascinating to me, perhaps because I have so often found myself on the receiving end of such labels.
My first actual recollection of being called "weird" dates back to my being maybe 7-8 years old in early grade school and the issue related to the fact that because my parents were much older (mom was 39 and dad 43 when I was born — as an only child — and that was seriously ancient in 1960!) than all my peers' they dressed me strangely and I had been brought up with a different sense of manners and behaviors than my friends.
That made me "weird."
Since then, I have had many an occasion to be called weird; from being in boarding school in the UK as a teenager and being the only Dane there to living in Texas during college where I was "weird" because I preferred art and literature to guns and pick-up truck engines, to some of my interests and hobbies as an adult setting me apart from the norm...
But this is not a story about my weirdness, it's an exploration of the whole thing called "WEIRD."
Why do we label things as "weird?" And why do we often associate a negative connotation with being... "non-standard?" It's a bit of a paradox, actually, because there's also a degree of admiration that often attaches to non-conformists; we call them "pioneers" and "trailblazers,"... and some people might even think along the lines of "I wish I could be more like that, but I CAN'T!"
Why not?
Conversely, why do we attach positive value to being some version of "normal," and "conformity?" Again, there's a bit of a paradox here, because most people don't actively want to be "invisible" in life, yet they embrace activities and behaviors that support some version of "blending into the crowd."
But what is "weird?" And what determines what constitutes "weird?"
Michele Gelfand is a professor of cultural psychology at the University of Maryland, and she theorizes that cultures, nations, peoples, communities and social groups fall along a scale from "tightness" to "looseness," in terms of how they consider individual behavior differences in the context of norms.
So, in a "tight" society, you're more likely to be regarded as "weird," than in a "loose" society... regardless of whether or not you actually are weird.
Which still brings us not much closer to understanding the entire idea of being weird... but one thing starts to make itself evident: Weirdness is partially about the extent to which you you are out-of-step with your immediate surroundings, and the degree to which that matters to those surroundings.
For example, a crystal-gazing New Age Hippie would be regarded as "weird" in Odessa, Texas but not particularly strange in Sedona, Arizona.
Another component of "weird" centers on our own willingness to — and comfort with — being different from the predominant crowd. Consider this: That "New Age Hippie" would arguably be perceived as more conformist in Sedona than in Odessa!
Of course, there are few arenas within which "weirdness" plays a greater role than politics.
Political affiliations — as "cultures" — tend to be almost as "tight" as the military, regardless of whether their leanings are conservative or liberal. If you don't toe the line, you're not just weird, but often unwelcome.
There's a level of polarity at play in the political arena, through which if you are not with us, you are by definition against us. Political discourse seldom tolerates neutrality.
Choices, Costs and Consequences
Choices have consequences. And most choices involve costs and tradeoffs. Back when I was in business school, the term "opportunity costs" was used a lot.
If you're an "independent spirit" who sees life through a somewhat unusual lens of perception — and stand by what you believe in — the "cost" of doing so tends to be that you experience a certain degree of judgment and disconnect from the world around you.
Either others just don't think like you, OR they find it more important to be "part of the group" than to stay true to themselves.
Personally speaking, "the group" has never served me very well, going back to being totally bored and disgusted with "popular" music, when I was a teenager.
Of course many people harbor feelings of being weird, in some fashion. Maybe you can't stand ice cream. Maybe tropical island paradises make your skin crawl. Or you have an unhealthy obsession with clowns.
These, however, tend to be singular points, rather than a total person. It takes more than a simple dislike of ice cream to be considered "weird!"
In her recent book "Weird" author Olga Khazan explores the entire concept in far more depth than I have here — in her case through the lens of perception of growing up as non-Christian Russian immigrant interested in science... in ultra-conservative, deeply religious Christian and somewhat xenophobic West Texas.
I suppose ultimately "weird" is what we make of it... and we can turn it into a burden, or we can turn it into an advantage. But it helps to first understand the dynamic of why humans seek to belong.
Thanks for reading!
Comments, feedback and other interaction is invited and welcomed! Because — after all — SOCIAL content is about interacting, right? Leave a comment-- share your experiences-- be part of the conversation!
(As usual, all text and images by the author, unless otherwise credited. This is original content, created expressly for this platform.)
Created at 20200613 18:56 PDT
0063/1290