Sure, but you're effectively self-voting and only giving the person that put effort into the post half of the rewards all the while relying on autovotes/vote-trading with other projects to earn more rewards for no effort.

What fight? It was a simple question and we reserve the right to unvote when we see things we don't agree, it mainly costs us voting power and curation rewards. Downvoting for disagreement of rewards as well is common, especially when it refers to ghostwriters not getting their full worth and relying on middle-men earning rewards based on their position while they get rewards for not having done anything - if that's what this is.

Weird response, maybe think about it first, especially since your last post is literally about communication or lack thereof.