I just saw in a post by that there is a survey going on in the CineTV community. It has to do with evergreen posts, and do I know about evergreen posts: I try to make most of my posts evergreens! - Okay, so maybe not this one right here. But the ones that make it into any of my collections I consider all to be evergreens. Among them, my Binge on This collection is a review of various TV series, which I have all posted in CineTV. So, let's look at those survey questions:
What are you doing with your old CINETV content? Do you ever link back to it?
I always love linking back to old posts, if it is relevant. And sure, one TV show will remind me of another one, especially if I've written about it before. For example, in my post about the pirate parody series Our Flag Means Death I linked in my previously posted review of Black Sails from a year and a half back. It is still as good as ever.
How do you feel about me (someone) republishing your content with attribution?
Great! I love it if my reviews are read, even way past payout. If there is an attribution, even better. Hopefully that way someone may read what I wrote about other series... or any of my other post collections.
Would you change the way you post if you knew that top quality evergreen content in this niche could generate more value over time past the post payout on HIVE?
Well, this is where we get into the definition of evergreen. I am certainly willing to make my posts better, and thus I am open for feedback. I enjoy writing my posts like I do, and it comes very nicely to see them listed up, in case I want to recommend someone a good show to see. So they're worth revisiting, at least for me. But would I make them longer or deeper to add quality? I don't know... I think 500-1000 words is a good length.
What are some of your best CINETV posts that you think have lasting value?
Okay, this will be a fairly random pick, since as I said, I liked each one of my reviews equally. So why not go with Dark now, and you tell me if it's evergreen material.