Order after chaos is a narrative that the elites (the WEF and WHO) endorse and implement to gain more power and control over the masses, widening the gap in access to freedoms and rights between the wealthy and the poor. The World Economic Forum and the World Health Organization, unelected entities, now make decisions regarding crucial freedoms and rights we once held.
These organizations have members infiltrating various offices, a fact no longer confined to conspiracy theories. Klaus Schwab has publicly revealed this trend, as their control over governments and lawmakers steadily grows. The WEF's recent widely known plan is to eliminate 75% of privately owned cars from the streets by 2050.
To establish order, chaos (crisis) is necessary, and the elites (WEF) are currently exploiting... you guessed it: climate change*. Their narrative suggests that increased CO2 emissions have altered the climate, causing global warming (which is a falsehood) and various climate-related disasters, including man-made wildfires.
Let's examine the statistics. Globally, the US contributes 14% of total CO2 emissions, the EU contributes 8%, and China contributes 32%. However, China is not part of this climate crisis game since it doesn't require such chaos (crisis) to control its citizens. China already operates as a modern communist country where the state exercises significant control over citizens' private lives and freedoms.
If you're skeptical, I urge you to invest a couple of hours to review studies that refute the claim that CO2 emissions significantly influence the climate, as these so-called leaders want us to believe. The greenhouse effect is a fallacy since planet Earth is not a literal greenhouse, unless we are being deceived about the true nature of the atmosphere and so on.
So, what's their plan? It appears that the unelected elites of the WEF aim to transition us toward sustainable urban mobility, as outlined in the WEF Urban Mobility Scorecard Tool. This vision involves most of the world's inhabitants residing in smart cities controlled through AI cameras and various tracking devices. In this scenario, cash, private transportation, and the freedom to explore one's surroundings and engage in normal activities would likely be limited.
Smart cities equate to prison cities, with EVs as software-controlled vehicles placing control in the hands of their creators and software developers. The plan involves relocating most rural residents to these smart cities, which would comprise 70% of the world's inhabited areas. Consequently, these unfortunate individuals would rely solely on public and shared transportation, lacking access to private vehicles.
No one will be explicitly forced to relinquish their right to own a private vehicle. However, when laws governing CO2 emissions are enacted, and taxes make car ownership burdensome, many people simply won't be able to afford owning cars anymore. Only the wealthy will enjoy such a luxury, while the rest of us will be left in dire straits... I struggle to find more appropriate words to describe such a scenario.
The WEF's net-zero by 2050 is another senseless idea that will grant supremacy to EVs (software-controlled vehicles) and relegate internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles to obscurity. In conclusion, if you've ever wondered what Klaus Schwab meant when he said "you will own nothing and be happy by 2030," we receive constant hints about the plan behind this.
As more people awaken to the reality, like the individual dismantling ULEZ cameras as shown in this video, installed by municipalities charging drivers $17 to access certain areas of the city, disobedience emerges as the only means of escape from this predicament. Crypto, arguably the most harmonious form of disobedience to date, provides a potential solution.
Thanks for your attention,
Adrian