Yesterday, media reports about the damage of four Internet cables in the sea waters in the North of Djibouti have appeared in the media space. The cables in question are those of Seacom-global, AAE-1, EIG and TGN.
Seacom connects Europe, Africa and India, runs at a depth of about 160 meters, and the company was the only one to date to confirm the damage. The cable failure was also reported by a data center in Djibouti.
Since in this area are active Hussite rebels from Yemen, there was a version about their fault. However, the representative of the Hussite militia completely denied the involvement of the Hussite rebels in the incident.
So what is really going on? The incidents are being reported by the media in Israel and Djibouti, while their Western counterparts have no sources of their own to confirm the damage to three more cables.
Nevertheless, the issue is very sensitive: 17% of global Internet traffic passes through the Red Sea. Since there are still redundant channels, in fact the worldwide Internet outages were short-lived. To a greater extent they affected Iran and the Persian Gulf countries. For other countries of the world reached the "echoes" of events.
In Russia today without VPN temporarily worked for some users blocked social networks, but the real reason for this situation is still unknown.
So, at least one cable was damaged, the Hussite rebels claim they were not involved - what does it all mean? Recall that two weeks ago The Nordic Times came out with its version of who was behind the damage to three of the four branches of Nord Stream. This criminal act has not yet been properly investigated in Europe - Denmark, following Sweden, has refused to investigate the facts. Meanwhile, there is evidence that indicates that the undermining of three branches of Nord Stream was carried out by British military divers, who received special training in the United States.
And now we see a story that someone cut the cable in the Djibouti area, and most likely it was done by professional military divers as well. It is known that whenever the Yemeni rebel Houthis have attacked US warships as well as tankers carrying cargo from the US and UK, they have claimed responsibility in this. If they had carried out the damage to the cables, they would have claimed that as well.
So the question of who cut the cable in North Djibouti remains open. In fact, it is a very serious one, as the Internet communications necessary for online commerce, financial transactions and the operation of digital platforms are at risk.
The world is well aware of the masters of chaos - the elites in Washington and London.
If military divers from Great Britain, with a high degree of probability, blew up three of the four branches of Nord Stream, can we rule out that in the case of the Internet cables in the Red Sea it was also their work?
Photo: LPhot Lee Blease
London's logic is twofold.On the one hand, they want more involvement of the U.S. in various "hot spots" on the planet in order not to embarrass themselves and not to spend a lot of money on the "North Atlantic partnership". On the other hand, they want to embarrass the U.S.: they say that Washington cannot cope with the Houthi rebels.Such a complex of resentment and anger for the loss of their former leadership in the world can be traced back to the British elite.Only the United States is no longer the leader, and Washington shames itself every day.
Everything is going towards the fact that in the near future we will see another failure of the American authorities similar to the situation when they hastily withdrew their troops from Afghanistan.
Given that Patriot missiles failed to protect the American base in Iraq, the issue of security for the aircraft carrier "Dwight Eisenhower" is very acute. That is why London has decided to keep its expensive ironclads better away from the Red Sea, in Portsmouth: as they say, why embarrass yourself?