Dr. Marty Makary of Johns Hopkins wrote a piece for the WSJ in July of 2021. He spoke about the flimsy evidence to justify vaccinating children.
He pointed out the total number of alleged deaths from COVID-19 for children was 335. But this is just the number they used for anyone who has a PCR positive result and died within a certain timeframe.
As he notes, they didn't investigate these deaths. They didn't determine if they were actually deaths FROM COVID-19.
A tremendous number of government and private policies affecting kids are based on one number: 335. That is how many children under 18 have died with a Covid diagnosis code in their record, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Yet the CDC, which has 21,000 employees, hasn’t researched each death to find out whether Covid caused it or if it involved a pre-existing medical condition.
Without these data, the CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices decided in May that the benefits of two-dose vaccination outweigh the risks for all kids 12 to 15. I’ve written hundreds of peer-reviewed medical studies, and I can think of no journal editor who would accept the claim that 335 deaths resulted from a virus without data to indicate if the virus was incidental or causal, and without an analysis of relevant risk factors such as obesity.
The reality is that these are merely deaths WITH COVID-19. There is absolutely no evidence to conclude that COVID-19 killed these children. None. Zero. Maybe some did, but there isn't any actual evidence that this is the case. These are assumptions from a 97% false positive PCR procedure, that can't even diagnose illness.
Over 600 children die from car accidents each year. But with half that number of dead from other reasons, that's justification to give them a dangerous injection that increases their risk of myocarditis?
That's the popular mainstream version of "science", i.e. scientism, it's a religion.