Hello community! This is your mastermind speaking...
The fact that the BRICS officially outperformed the G7 in terms of GDP is a sign that there is no turning back. In the real economy, this overtaking had already taken place some time ago, but the criteria for the GDP's composition, also established in the West in light of neoliberalism, had managed to hide this reality through avalanches of money that were produced with no foundation and were therefore only sustained by themselves. Coincidentally, Louis Vuitton, which also owns other ultra-luxury brands, moved its Asian headquarters from Hong Kong to Shanghai on the same day that the superseding was announced, underscoring the decline of a world in which the West, particularly the American empire, is no longer the dominant shareholder, not even in the futile sphere, and thus cannot assert the right to decide anything, to declare sanctions on its own, to wage wars, or to steal resources.
However, Europe has responded to the problem by establishing a kind of Co2 protectionism by taxing imports according to their actual or assumed carbon impact, which is the fastest method to make its citizens poorer and less free. Perhaps our continent, which is tied together not by peoples but by economic oligarchies, seeks to instill in everyone a maddening sense of virtue? No, it's just hypocrisy; despite the fact that our continent produces only 15% of the carbon dioxide that is anthropogenic (which is 4% of the total produced by biomass), it appears to be morally upright. However, when one takes into account its imports, one finds that it is the second-largest producer of CO2 in the world. Does he have the fortitude and moral integrity to impose the insane theory of climate catastrophism on others? It has been emitted by others to transform its frailty and deindustrialization into an affirmation of carbon purity and, consequently, of climate probity. No, it won't, and it's also certain that a small tariff won't do much to help local industry, which is already suffering from the same restrictions as well as from American gas prices, all the energy cost increases brought on by the pandemic, and the Russian sanctions: it will only serve to raise prices and favor mega-industries, assuming they can continue to operate.
In the same way that imposing CO2 quotas to private persons' use of automobiles and heating only benefits the wealthy and sends the small and medium bourgeoisie and the popular classes back to hell, this standard favors the wealthy. before emerging from your slumber. The rise in prices will inevitably favor a new wave of inflation precisely at the time when the ECB will need to raise rates to address the previous wave, which will result in a decline in investments and consumption while the weight of the debt inexorably rises due to the rise in interest rates: the ideal scenario to cause the GDP to decline and drastically reduce what is left of the welfare state. The fact that this so-called ecological transition, which moves on the dual track of catastrophic nonsense and the practical impossibility of achieving Net Zero, actually has an ecological purpose that has nothing to do with the hypotheses and theories used as a lock pick, but instead intends to create the conditions for a drastic drop in nataklity and, consequently, of the population or, in some dogmas, the real "polluting element." In reality, individuals who have long preached a Malthusianism in various ways and frequently mistakenly coupled with forms of racism are directly opposing the green movement like a cudgel. It is quite obvious that the focus on climate issues is solely intended to set the stage for an economic downturn caused by the dramatic drop in birthrate, which is already happening and requires replacement immigration, but which will soon affect everyone, including the replacements.
Another reason to celebrate the emergence of the BRICS is that it demonstrates how all of this cultural trash of Anglo-Saxon style, which is embraced by the most subservient as if it were a verb, no longer has the support of the economic majority and the power to force itself everywhere. Additionally, it advocates for population control and lowering birth rates from the perspective of induced poverty rather than from that of the elite who fear that the poor would contaminate their private Eden. Instead, it is exactly well-being that fosters the circumstances for a balanced fall in the population, as has been shown throughout every age. But if everyone is happy, there will be less money made, and that is definitely not acceptable.
Don't believe the lies! The truth sets us free! Have a good day !
image from here
