(source)
"Now we know that the vaccines work well enough that the virus stops with every vaccinated person. A vaccinated person gets exposed to the virus, the virus does not infect them, the virus cannot then use them to go anywhere else." - MSNBC talk show host Rachel Maddow, March 29, 2021
"When people are vaccinated, they can feel safe that they are not going to get infected." - US Coronavirus Czar Dr. Anthony Fauci, May 17, 2021
"If you're vaccinated, you're not gonna be hospitalized, you're not gonna be in an ICU unit, and you are not gonna to die. You're ok, you're not gonna get Covid if you have these vaccinations." - President Joe Biden, July 21, 2021
The time is fast coming when the American public will be forced to come to terms with the fact that all the promises concerning the sacred jab made to sell the public on these experimental Covid injections throughout the duration of the initial vaccination campaign were total hogwash, absolute nonsense, nothing but a pile of false assurances, peddled in a desperate attempt to coerce every last one of us into volunteering for the largest drug trial in human history and to then mandate participation in this global experiment for the unwilling. These politicians, 'experts', media pundits, and 'vaccine' pushers of all shades spent the better part of the year selling their lies to the public in an attempt to vaccinate the entire country - either blatantly lying to the American public or ignorantly misinforming them with bold assurances based upon faulty data and a whole lot of blind faith in big Pharma. Either way, they were wrong, and neither scenario should inspire trust in those who continue to insist that every last one of us must bow to the will of the unelected technocratic order and take their sacred jab.
The evidence of this fraud is everywhere one turns these days, and it is right there in the heart of the establishment narrative, being put out there in plain sight by the Mockingbird Media for all to see. Attempting to make sense of all the contradictory narratives being told these days will surely make your head spin; for when the deception driving the agenda becomes too obvious to hide, confusing the masses becomes the name of the game, although it's easy enough to see the reality hiding behind that veil of confusion.
Broken promises, deadly lies and the damning admission that should have stopped the 'vaccine' rollout in its tracks
On December 16, just as the global push for boosters was cranking into full gear in the wake of the 'Omicron' scare[iant], WPRI News (Channel 12) reported that a healthy 41 year old Cranston East teacher and volleyball coach died suddenly after a short bout with Covid. "Meaghan McGonagle, 41, died Thursday morning after a brief battle with COVID-19, according to Cranston Mayor Ken Hopkins," the outlet reported. Oh, that's right, she was also 'fully vaccinated'.
“This is a young woman, 41 years old, in good health, that had the early vaccinations,” Hopkins said. “She was just a good person with a young family … I’m heartbroken for her kids, for her husband, and we’re sending our heartfelt sympathy from the city.”
This story would be the latest in a long line of countless thousands of cases of vaccinated Americans to become infected, develop symptoms, and then die from disease diagnosed as 'Covid-19'. 'Breakthrough cases', they're called, downplayed and intentionally under-counted, but still the CDC has a whole page dedicated to the phenomenon, although the agency is only counting 'breakthrough' hospitalizations and deaths because the fast growing number of 'breakthrough cases' was becoming embarrassingly high as soon as tracking began - revealing that Biden's promise, that "If you're vaccinated...you are not gonna die," is absolutely false. McGonagle and millions of other Americans were told in no uncertain terms by America's top Covid 'expert' that "they can feel safe that they are not going to get infected," and yet she still got sick and died, despite her compliance, along with thousands of other compliant Americans who have proven what many of the 'experts' themselves have finally begrudgingly admitted, in statements wildly contradicting the initial promises made to sell the public on these pharmaceutical interventions - that these shots do not prevent infection, transmission, symptomatic disease, hospitalization or death.
It's been nearly five months since the CDC director herself first admitted in early August that the 'vaccines' don't stop transmission of the 'virus', the one thing they would absolutely have to do in order to 'end the pandemic', which was the sole purpose of the vaccination campaign as originally sold to the public. Most of us can recall the relentless assurances that things would eventually be going back to normal upon the arrival of the miraculous 'vaccines' which would 'vanquish the virus', and Bill Gates was on the front lines of this propaganda campaign, repeatedly promising that things would return to normal once high vaccination coverage rates of 60-80% were reached. But then, on November 5, this same champion of the global injection coercion campaign admitted that his beloved shots do not stop transmission, contradicting his own previous assurances that they would and then that they did.
"We didn't have vaccines that block transmission. We got vaccines that help you with your health, but they only slightly reduce the transmission. We need a new way of doing the vaccines."
Last December, in the final days before the long-awaited vaccination campaign was first launched, Gates was singing quite a different tune, that "it looks like all of the vaccines are going to succeed," and that by Spring, "we’ll be headed back to normal.”
He didn't change his tune for nearly a year, until he finally admitted the truth, when the data forced him to admit the obvious. In the 18 months leading up to his admission that his pet project had been a complete and total failure, Gates had repeatedly told audiences that it was their duty to take the shot in order to stop the spread of the 'virus', everyone had to take it, and those who questioned the universal injection dogma in any way were deemed science-denying conspiratorial purveyors of misinformation. The officials who right alongside him made the same claims have since contradicted themselves in like fashion, revealing that the biggest purveyors of dangerous medical misinformation from the beginning of this fiasco have been those driving this vaccination campaign, those seeking to mandate an ineffective injection on the entire population.
As it turns out, these injections were never going to stop transmission, not all that surprising considering the clinical trials themselves were not designed to measure success based on ability to prevent infection and transmission, but only the reduction of symptoms, and only mild symptoms at that, not hospitalization and death. Maybe that's why they don't prevent hospitalization or death either, despite being sold as 95% effective, although proponents continue to insist they do reduce it. There is no way for them to know that, however; it is either pure conjecture or an outright lie. Only an extended trial with a randomized control group could ever tell us whether the number of hospitalizations and deaths among the vaccinated are actually less than they otherwise would be, and as it is the trial is ongoing into 2022 with every injection recipient a participant, and the coercion campaign aimed at injecting the entire population an obvious attempt to eradicate the control group. And they aren't vaccinations, they are therapeutics, experimental gene therapy injections; a vaccine would be preventing infection and transmission.
But despite the inefficacy of these injections becoming increasingly apparent, the coercion campaign marches on, with 'vaccines' still being sold as the best 'defense' against a 'virus' they are both admittedly and demonstrably not working to stop. The insanity of the recent push to get boosters into the arms of the entire adult population who succumbed to the pressure while pushing the newly authorized initial children's doses on kids 5-11 years old who are at zero risk of the disease is apparent to anyone who is simply reading the mainstream news stories coming out these days with even a fragment of their brain power turned on. Get the shot to stop the spread of the scary Omicron variant, as Omicron is at the very same time being spread almost exclusively by and to the fully vaccinated and boosted population. In every single instance that I have seen reported, the first 'confirmed' Omicron case in localities was, like clockwork, among the fully vaccinated and boosted.
Medical misinformation from on high, propaganda and truth alike hiding in plain sight
Browsing through a local newspaper this week, the story of the very first two 'confirmed' Omicron cases in Montana caught my eye, and unsurprisingly, like every other news report on first Omicron case in an area I have read - from Israel to Australia, and the UK to California (the first state here in the US to report a 'confirmed' Omicron case) - Omicron was brought to the state by two fully vaccinated individuals. "The individuals, who had mild symptoms that are improving ... were fully vaccinated," the "news from DPHHS" read, in the December 29th edition of the Valley Journal.
"This is not a surprise," the very next sentence begins, quoting Montana DPHHS Director Adam Meier, whose top priority was, incredibly, to urge people to get vaccinated to stop the spread of the 'virus'!
"We continue to urge all Montanas to use all available tools to stay healthy this winter, including getting your COVID-19 vaccine and booster and taking other measures to prevent the spread of the virus."
Stop the spread of the virus by taking the very product we just informed you doesn't stop the spread of the virus. Their propaganda has literally become just that ridiculous. That public health officials, puppet politicians, and the corporate media continue to push vaccination as the primary means of stopping the spread of the very thing they have repeatedly admitted it doesn't stop the spread of, is evidence that this ongoing vaccination push is but pharmaceutical propaganda that has nothing at all to do with public health, science, ending a 'pandemic', or anything but Pfizer and Moderna profits and the political technocratic agenda to introduce universal digital identification (QR code) currently being passed off as vaccine or immunity passports.
The Journal goes on to quote the Montana State Medical Officer of DPPHS, Dr. Maggie Cook-Shimanek, as citing a current nationwide "surge" in 'COVID-19' cases, primarily 'Delta', as the reason "it's important that we ... take proven steps to prevent disease and mitigate the spread" of the virus.
To that end, DPPHS encourages all Montanans to take the following steps to protect themselves from becoming infected with COVID-19, including variants like Omicron: Get vaccinated and if eligible get a booster.
But it is quite evident, as both the State Medical Officer and HHS Director are well aware, along with the author of the news release blindly parroting their recommendations, that the 'vaccine' is NOT a "proven step" to "prevent disease" or "mitigate the spread" of the virus, as clearly demonstrated by the announcement that the latest variant was brought to the state by fully vaccinated individuals, along with a host of real world data, additional admissions from health authorities around the world, and several scientific studies. The insistence upon vaccination for the unvaccinated and boosters for the fully vaccinated to stop the spread of a 'virus' being spread by the fully vaccinated and the boosted is beyond nonsensical, and that fact that anyone at all will continue to believe in these shots as their salvation in the face of such absurdity shows just how brainwashed, just how programmed some individuals have become throughout this so-called pandemic, their minds literally hijacked by an industry that continues to insist the best way to protect themselves against something that poses no real threat to them is to use something that admittedly doesn't work against the non-threat.
It admittedly didn't work to stop transmission or prevent infection before Omicron when Delta was all the rage, and so it is patently absurd to believe the shot will somehow stop the spread now when the vast majority of Omicron cases are in fact among the fully vaccinated and even the boosted! And citing a surge in Delta cases as reason to get the shot - because many are protesting against the need to be injected against a strain causing such mild, irrelevant disease - does not bolster the case for injection, either, as this problem of a total lack of 'vaccine' efficacy had already become the elephant in the room well before Omicron's appearance on the world stage, as I documented extensively several months ago.
The injections aren't working, so let's roll out more injections, is literally what the latest vaccination propaganda boost amounts to, or, as Robert F. Kennedy Jr. puts it: "Health officials and vaccine makers call for boosters after studies show Pfizer vaccine is less effective against Omicron, but data on breakthrough cases suggest the vaccine hasn’t been effective against other strains, either."
https://twitter.com/robertkennedyjr/status/1471128960788484097
- robertkennedyjr
Report: Studies Find Pfizer Vaccine Less Effective Against Omicron
As I have previously documented, the World Health Organization (WHO), experts around the world including the SA doctor who discovered the new variant, and now even the CDC, have all confirmed that the vast majority of Omicron cases produce extremely mild cold-like symptoms with extremely low rates of hospitalization and no deaths to speak of, while an overwhelming majority of Omicron cases are among the fully vaccinated and boosted. And as I also recently documented, according to the same establishment that continues to relentlessly advance the injection coercion campaign upon humanity, as announced by The Atlantic in the wake of Omicron, "The Pandemic of the Vaccinated is Here."
Also according to the establishment via UK's The Telegraph, "Omicron wave [is] driven by 'young, healthy, vaccinated' population."
"The omicron epidemic is being driven by young, vaccinated people, according to mounting data from countries as diverse as the UK, Denmark and South Africa," The Telegraph reports. The spread of Omicron is literally being driven by vaccinated people. Let that sink in for a moment. And then ask yourself why that might be. By the end of the post, maybe you'll have yourself an answer.
Relevant to the discussion at hand are the highly ignored facts being simultaneously publicly reported and actively suppressed by the very same establishment now pushing boosters on the entire global population:
The new variant has now been detected in more than 60 countries, including 24 in Europe, with a similar pattern of infection and characteristics being reported across the globe.
Telegraph authors then note that the "vaccine evading properties of the virus are now established."
“Generally those first cases are in relatively young, relatively healthy and – in the context of Europe – in relatively highly vaccinated groups,” Dr Catherine Smallwood, a senior emergency officer at the World Health Organization’s Europe office, told the Telegraph.
According to a large Denmark study:
Some 75 per cent of these cases were in fully vaccinated individuals, the institute added, confirming that even the double jabbed can carry the virus.
Daily cases in Denmark have surged by a third since early December, despite almost 80 per cent of the population being double vaccinated.
The CDC "also revealed that 79 per cent of people infected were vaccinated," while Dr. Smallwood also said "that data so far suggests there is a real increase in the number of breakthrough cases in vaccinated individuals, compared to previous waves."
The logical response, in the face of such evidence, then, is obviously to insist that vaccination is the best way to stop the spread of Omicron, despite all the evidence suggesting that is not the case! Just assure the growing 'vaccine hesitant' population, which now includes millions of 'fully vaccinated' people hesitant to take a booster shot, just assure them that the ineffectiveness of the first set of injections or so-called waning immunity is the reason for this obvious pandemic of the vaccinated and insist that a booster is not only the best, but the only way to stop the spread of the 'virus'. Such a theory may at first sound plausible, if one is both willing to blindly accept the veracity of the assurances of those whose every single previous promise about these 'vaccines' has turned out to be false, as well as ignore the mountain of evidence that the so-called boosted population is no more protected or less likely to spread Omicron than the double-injected commonly known as the 'fully vaccinated'.
In Israel, where the 'fully vaccinated' now refers exclusively to the triple-jabbed, who are elsewhere being widely referred to as the 'boosted', 80% of reported Omicron cases are in the fully vaccinated or those who have received the booster shot, an identical picture to the one unfolding across Europe and America in populations of fully vaccinated where the term refers to the double rather than triple injected. With the establishment definition of 'unvaccinated' generally now referring to anyone who is not 'fully vaccinated', there is really not much evidence at all to suggest that Omicron is being spread by those who haven't had any of the experimental injections, apart from a select few cases among the so-called 'unvaccinated' minority of Omicron cases in folks who are explicitly described as having not received any injections at all.
A number of news reports and social media accounts from elsewhere around the world have also reported on Omicron cases in those who have taken the booster shots, further revealing that the booster doesn't guarantee a 'boost' in 'protection' to the recipient or reduce transmission of Omicron at all.
When science meets propaganda & boosters meet Omicron - new studies, real world data, and the crumbling illusion
Meanwhile the recently published bombshell Denmark study, although purporting to find the booster to have an increased effectiveness against Omicron, actually simultaneously revealed that even the boosted population accounts for more cases attributed to both Omicron as well as other variants (primarily Delta according to the official narrative) than the unvaccinated, also that the vaccinated population at large accounts for the vast majority of Covid cases among both Omicron (91.5%) and other variants (77.1%), and that the relative risk of Omicron infection upon exposure is significantly higher among both the fully vaccinated and the boosted than among those who haven't had any doses of these experimental injections. In short, you aren't at all better off vaccinated or even boosted than you are without any injection 'protection' at all, in fact you're worse off...
These stunning numbers - coming not from the independent media 'anti-vaccine' conspiracy crowd but rather a scientific study sponsored by the Danish government's own Department of Infectious Disease and Epidemiology Prevention and published on the establishment's own medRxiv preprint server which is hosted by the prestigious BMJ and Yale (and sponsored by technocrat Mark Zuckerberg himself) - indicate that, as Ezra Levant of the Ezra Levant show puts it: "You are literally more likely to get infected if you are vaccinated with Pfizer or Moderna than if you're not."
This scientific data shows that 56% of the double-injected ('fully vaccinated') are catching 65% of "other variants" & 79% of Omicron, and 25% of the triple-injected ('boosted') still catch 10% of Omicron cases, while the unvaccinated only account for 8.5% of cases attributed to the new variant. As Dr. William Makis rightly concludes, "This is worse than vaccine failure. This is damage."
https://twitter.com/MakisMD/status/1472856530139561987
- MakisMD
While an ineffective injection is one thing, an increased risk of infection is another thing altogether, and that is exactly what we get with these experimental injections - a shot that delivers negative efficacy. Notably, although the data shows a 54.6% initial 'vaccine' efficacy against Omicron with Pfizer in the first 30 days following the 3rd dose boost, this is actually less effective than the 55.2% initial efficacy following double-injection, with the 82.8% initial booster efficacy observed in Moderna a markedly lower rate than the 88.2% in the first month of 'full vaccination'. Although the booster shot may initially boost observed 'protection', it appears to be even less effective than the first pair of shots against Omicron, which isn't good; dropping sharply from the dismal 55% initial efficacy in the first month to just 16% in the second month to a whopping negative 76.5% efficacy at three months with Pfizer, while Moderna which fairs a little better still sees a negative 39.3% efficacy against Omicron after three months. That's how much more likely a 'fully vaccinated' individual is to become infected than one who is not vaccinated, and seeing as the data indicates the booster is initially even less effective, it's a safe bet that after three months following their boost, the risk of infection among the boosted will be that much higher than it was three months following their second injection.
As Steve Kirch notes in his analysis of these study findings, what this means is that the 'vaccine' pushers lied to us: "In short, we’ve been lied to about the vaccine. It is protecting you less and less over time." But if you're a regular reader of this blog, you already know that. But what you may not know is if you want to be 'protected' against Omicron and you're already vaccinated, you'll need a booster every month, likely more frequently with each new variant to achieve an ever weakening level of peak protection until eventually even a weekly shot won't be worth the trip to the vaccination clinic. Once you're on this 'vaccine' treadmill, there's no getting off, and I'm guessing if they had told us that from the get go, quite a bit fewer of us would have caved to the pressure to 'do your part' and 'just get the shot'.
Kirch explains:
This paper means we will need to inject people every 30 days if we want to “protect” them. Based on the harm that the vaccines do to our immune system, it’s likely that the needed interval will shorten with each booster.
If people don’t get boosted as required, they will be MORE vulnerable to Delta and Omicron than if they weren’t vaccinated. That’s what NEGATIVE vaccine efficacy means. It doesn’t mean the protection wears off (like we were told). It means the OPPOSITE of what you were told: it means the vaccines helps the virus to infect you (by suppressing your immune system, probably permanently each time we are injected according to Dr. Ryan Cole). It means we were lied to.
In short, the vaccine is like a heroin addiction: once you’ve had a taste of it, you are hooked: you have to continue it for life if you want protection. If you stop it, you’re a sitting duck for the virus.
But better to be a sitting duck for Omicron than for a future variant that isn't quite so mild, I suppose. Probably better to halt the damage to the immune system leading to an increase in a wide range of disease and reduce the chances of developing permanent autoimmunity by getting off the injection treadmill now before embarking down the long road of endless boosters, especially considering the risk of sustaining any of the numerous other serious adverse reactions from these shots increases with each additional injection. But maybe some initial injection recipients are still thinking that 'benefits outweigh the risks'...
Public Health England data has already for many, many weeks now, since long before the emergence of Omicron, been demonstrating that the injections exponentially increase risk of hospitalization and death among the elderly who are infected, in a country where the majority of Covid cases have for months now also been among the vaccinated, as I and many others in the independent media have repeatedly pointed out. The most recent data from the UK from weeks 47-50 shows the trend continues, with over 88% of Covid deaths among Brits over 79 years old in the vaccinated, and 3.1x as many deaths attributed to Covid in those 70-79, while all vaccinated individuals 60 years of age and older who contract the virus are exponentially more likely to develop severe disease leading to hospitalization and death than the unvaccinated.
These post-injection waves of Covid have never constituted a 'pandemic of the unvaccinated' as it was for a time portrayed by the Big Pharma propagandists here in the US, but has from the beginning always been what they are only now finally just beginning to admit, a pandemic of the vaccinated. As Dr Simon Idris Beshir wrote in his detailed June paper, Mass Vaccination Triggering COVID19 Waves Worldwide: "In 90 countries, there is a close and timely correlation between the roll-out of COVID19 vaccination and subsequent significant surge of COVID cases & deaths." A number of the locales where this disturbing correlation has been seen are also documented in RFK Jr.'s eye-opening new book, The Real Anthony Fauci, a selection of the graphs showing data from 24 countries depicting this phenomenon included below - the needle icon marks the launch of the vaccination campaigns.
Notably, in Israel, both major Covid waves of 2021 were immediately preceded by its two vaccination campaign launches (the 2nd being the booster rollout), while a number of countries that were relatively untouched by Covid until they began injecting their population, including Thailand and Uganda, which saw no notable Covid deaths at all during the initial 'pandemic' in Spring/Summer of 2020, then experienced their very first surge in Covid deaths immediately following their vaccination rollouts in 2021. Nobel Prize winning virologist Luc Montagnier, a true expert if there ever was one, argues that this is a terribly unacceptable "scientific and a medical mistake," because the injections are, quite predictably for a 'leaky vaccine' (which these are), causing the variants, causing the post-injection Covid waves of 2021: "The new variants are a production and the result of vaccination. You see it in every country, it is the same: the curve of vaccination is followed by the curve of deaths."
Data from Israel, UK and elsewhere has repeatedly revealed that the vast majority of the cases, hospitalizations and deaths alike in these post-injection surges are indeed among the fully vaccinated. The establishment has only in recent months begun to admit that the injections are ineffective, but the data appears to suggest the likelihood of a far more sinister scenario, that the injections are not only failing to prevent the spread of disease and death, but are to a large degree actually causing it. After all, an injection that is merely ineffective can hardly explain away the excess all-cause mortality in 2021 across much of the planet in highly vaccinated regions, and in many cases even surpasses the excess mortality rates of 2020 complete with the 'pandemic' absent this 'protection'. But whether those thousands of 'fully vaccinated' individuals whose deaths have been attributed to Covid actually died because of a 'vaccine' that failed to protect them or one that literally caused them to die, it makes little difference in determining that those who pushed the 'vaccines' on them and continue to repeat the 'safe and effective' mantra are lying to us all; and if it wasn't intentional deception then, it sure as hell is no accident now.
With the overwhelming amount of evidence showing just how ineffective these injections are at stopping Covid infection, transmission and deadly disease in the 'fully vaccinated', the narrative has predictably shifted away from the initial pair of injections to the 'booster' shot now available to the American public, being hailed as the only way to stop the scary new Omicron variant, but as anyone with a single eye and two brain cells left can see, a third injection isn't stopping the spread of Omicron, or Delta, or anything else being diagnosed as Covid either.
At the very same time as public health officials, corporate media and the pharmaceutical companies themselves attempt to sell the booster to the public on the grounds that the first two shots are alone ineffective at preventing infection or stopping the spread of the virus, they continue to relentlessly batter parents with propaganda designed to convince them to give first injections of the recently authorized Pfizer shots to their children who are literally at zero risk from Covid, because of Omicron.
Such as the December 21 US News propaganda piece insisting that despite lingering questions about the injections for young children, "now is not the time to wait," headlined: *Omicron Is Here. Vaccinate Your Kids."
Or an ABC News Australia video report entitled, Why Omicron is a reminder that getting 5 to 11-year-olds vaccinated is as important as ever.
The report makes the baseless claim that "high vaccination rates are keeping hospitalization rates low," but conveniently glosses over the fact that it was vaccinated travelers who brought the variant to the country in the first place. And despite candidly admitting that Omicron "partially evades" the "immunity from ... vaccination," the newscaster and featured 'experts' insist that it is a reminder of the importance of immediately vaccinating our youngest children, even while simultaneously admitting that available data "suggests the mildness is in the virus itself, rather than people having background immunity."
But the clown show absurdity doesn't stop there, as the CEO of Pfizer's 'vaccine' development partner, BioNTech, told the French daily Le Monde on December 20 that the boosters won't stop the spread of the virus.
“We must be aware that even triple-vaccinated are likely to transmit the disease,” he told French daily Le Monde.
“It is obvious we are far from 95 percent effectiveness that we obtained against the initial virus,” he added.
Maybe the media outlets and health officials who continue to this day to insist that boosters are the best way to curb the spread of Omicron didn't get the memo: Even the boosted are likely to transmit the disease.
"It is obvious," 'vaccine' developer CEO said of the Pfizer/BioNTech mRNA injection, that the booster is "far from" the initial effectiveness of double-injection against initial virus, which was said to be 95% at peak protection but immediately began to wane, all but completely dissipating in just 3-6 months. And the 1st dose actually increases risk of infection for the first two weeks, but no need to mention that in the sales pitch. Oh, and that alleged 95% efficacy against initial virus that is no longer relevant with initial virus no longer in the picture, well that's actually relative risk reduction, not absolute risk reduction which at peak 'protection' was only ever 0.84%!
In other words, the booster is far from effective against relevant variants Delta, Omicron and the like, just as the scientific data has already showed, and the CEO of the 'vaccine' developer for the most relevant Covid injection on the planet publicly told us so on December 20. The recent admission was in line with previous statements made by Pfizer spokespeople saying a 3rd dose probably wouldn't quite cut it and that a 4th dose would likely be needed, but it sure stands in stark contrast to the more prominent previous statement made by both companies which was widely picked up by the media, the bold early claim that this 3rd dose 'booster' would literally "neutralize" Omicron. What a joke.
As reported by the Wall Street Journal on December 8, for example, clearly suggesting that while two doses wouldn't cut it, three would be more than enough to stop Omicron in its tracks: "Pfizer Says Booster Neutralized Omicron but Variant May Elude Two Doses."
The Reuters headline was less honest, announcing the Pfizer/BioNTech claim as an undisputed fact of reality, not even bothering to wrap the the key word ‘neutralizes’ in quotation marks.
We now know that this is far from the truth, in fact almost the complete opposite of what real world data and studies alike are all showing, and the very same companies who first sold the lie have now both changed course and publicly admitted as much, with Pfizer outdoing BioNTech in regards to the truly schizophrenic nature of these contradictions, Pfizer CEO literally announcing that a fourth shot would be needed the very same day the company announced that the 3rd dose effectively 'neutralized' Omicron.
In the face of a growing mountain of evidence and manufacturer admissions, still the propagandists hold strong to the establishment mantra - 'safe and effective' - with an ABC News headline on December 24, four days after the BioNTech admission, making the incredible claim that: "Boosters are the best defense against Omicron. But that message isn't getting through."
And one wonders why that message isn't getting through... I can think of a few relevant reasons right off the top of my head, but thinking is so outdated now, and compliance is in style, so fill up on your daily dose of propaganda from Cheyenne Haslett, who explains the establishment's dilemma:
For weeks now, as public health experts have warned about the COVID-19 omicron variant and its incredible ability to infect people, they've followed the bad news with good: booster shots available to every adult in the U.S. drive protection against omicron back up.
After setting the stage, the ABC propagandist turns straight to the big lie.
One of a few glimmers of scientific optimism in the omicron era is that the variant can be held at bay or kept to a very mild infection when people get a boost. And yet, just 4 in 10 eligible Americans have gotten a booster shot.
Well, actually the variant cannot be held at bay by the booster, as the CDC data itself quite clearly shows, but maybe the folks over at ABC News got their wires crossed, because I also distinctly remember the ABC News Australia broadcaster telling us that those milder symptoms were due to the nature of the virus and not vaccination ('background immunity'), an assessment that has since been backed up by loads of data, while this ABC writer is insisting that it can be kept mild with a 'boost', although it's rather impossible for an inherently mild infection to be kept mild with anything, as it was never gonna be severe to begin with! As for that 'bad' news, it isn't actually really all that bad at all except for those selling the shots, and is arguably the best thing that could happen for a public seeking an end to this endless 'pandemic', while the 'good' news is also only good for the 'vaccine' manufacturers raking in billions off of their fraudulent booster campaign. If it isn't already obvious, why this is the case will soon become clear, as will the absolute absurdity of this less than accurate headline, to put it kindly.
If boosters are the best defense against Omicron, then what evidence is there to support such a bold claim, considering they are at best no more effective than the original pair of injections that were never able to prevent infection, transmission, severe disease or even death? The propagandists offer none, unwilling to shine the light on the competition and preferring to mindlessly parrot the claims of the 'experts' who are in the pockets of Big Pharma. According to the science, however, of which there is much, natural immunity and not boosters is by far the better defense against all variants that have or ever will emerge, at least for the time being until a truly effective actual Covid vaccine is developed, which would take at least several years, and is a prime reason why it isn't being done. Putting natural immunity aside, the highly effective early Covid treatments should also be just as effective against Covid now as they were before Omicron, unless this isn't at all the same disease in which case we have bigger lies to deal with, although in either case the mild symptoms generally preclude the need for any treatment or prevention at all.
According to the 'expert' cited by ABC to bolster its unsubstantiated claim that flies in the face of the available data and science, however, the booster is highly effective against Omicron, "exponential" in fact!
"The booster is exponential. It's not just a little bit different. It's a lot different," said Janet Hamilton, an epidemiologist and the executive director at Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists, a group that works closely with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
"I don't know that we have really communicated that effectively enough for people to say, 'I really need to get this, this is a big deal,'" she said.
Maybe they've communicated their pharmaceutical propaganda plenty well, and the reason 'the message' isn't getting through to people, the reason only four in ten Americans have gotten a booster in the face of a steady stream of relentless propaganda and incessant fear-mongering, has to do with statements made by the likes of the BioNTech CEO that the booster is "far from" effective against the current strains of virus driving disease, or the real world data coming out of highly boosted Israel indicating that 80% of Omicron cases are among the boosted, or maybe due to the plethora of news stories and health agencies reporting Omicron cases in both the 'fully vaccinated' and the 'boosted'. It could also be because some Americans still have a memory, and can recall that just six months ago, following an FDA safety meeting in which it was clearly demonstrated that the Pfizer jab causes more harm than it prevents, both the FDA and CDC vaccine oversight committees voted overwhelmingly against approval of boosters for the general public, decisions based on the overwhelming evidence against boosters that were nonetheless both immediately overruled by the head honchos at the captured 'regulatory' agencies. Now boosters are increasingly being mandated to the young and healthy. Oh, the irony.
Dissent against the booster campaign is strong, even within the FDA, but the media won't talk about that, and if they do they paint the scientific dissent as 'politics' and the political fast-tracking of an untested 3rd dose of an experimental injection as 'science'.
Maybe the public is beginning to see through this facade, and maybe the establishment message is struggling to get through to Americans because of the findings of strong scientific studies like the one coming out of Denmark, which hasn't been the only one of its kind either.
In complete contravention of the early claims that a 3rd dose of the Pfizer injection "neutralizes" Omicron, the findings from a study by researchers at Columbia University published as a pre-print on December 15 suggest, according to the authors, that: "B.1.1.529 [Omicron] is now the most complete “escapee” from neutralization by currently available antibodies." As for that almighty booster, being simply a 3rd dose of the very same injection formula that is failing against the new variant, it doesn't produce any different antibodies than those already being produced by the first two injections, but rather simply boosts the number of available antibodies in the blood that then rapidly diminish after each injection, and weakens the immune system at the same time, increasing the risk of the recipient developing autoimmune disease.
The authors conclude:
As more and more [variants] appeared, our interventions directed to the spike became increasingly ineffective. The Omicron variant has now put an exclamation mark on this point. It is not too far-fetched to think that this SARS-CoV-2 is now only a mutation or two away from being pan-resistant to current antibodies, either monoclonal or polyclonal. We must devise strategies that anticipate the evolutional direction of the virus and develop agents that target better conserved viral elements.
In other words, the injection that was arguably relatively ineffective to begin with is becoming increasingly ineffective as the 'virus' mutates, and we are now reaching a stage in the evolution of the virus where the injections are no longer effective, at all, whatsoever. This is due in large part to an injection designed to target the spike protein alone, which changes with each mutation, whereas natural immunity both targets all facets of the virus and boasts a far more complete immunity which includes robust cellular and mucosal immunity that the so-called 'vaccine'-induced immunity fails to achieve, as I documented extensively back in September in my comprehensive piece on the orchestrated 'disappearance' of natural immunity from the Covid narrative that coincided with the vaccination campaign launch at the beginning of the year.
Natural immunity, still the nail in the coffin of the grand illusion
This is why studies have found increased risk of infection with the newer variants compared to Alpha (the 1st major variant) following vaccination, but "no increased risk for reinfection" with the same variants (Beta, Gamma, Delta) following natural infection; while "subjects previously infected with ancestral variant SARS-CoV-2" produce "ultrapotent antibodies" against 13 "diverse and highly transmissible SARS-CoV-2 variants" including Delta, creating antibodies a year after infection that "cross-neutralize emerging VOCs [variants of concern] with high potency," as the peer-reviewed study published in Science on August 13, 2021 found.
Interestingly, researchers also discovered one particularly fascinating ‘super antibody’ for COVID in the naturally immune that is "able to prevent a range of SARS-CoV-2 variants" and even a number of other coronaviruses "from spreading among cells," suggesting that those who have recovered from infection are not only protected from a wide range of variants that escape 'vaccine immunity' but potentially also all other coronaviruses. Shedding more light on the likely invincibility of natural immunity against all present and future potential mutations was that this and 11 others "antibodies that could disable a wide variety of viruses targeted sections of the binding domain that tended not to change as the virus evolved." So the science suggests that no matter how many mutations occur, natural immunity will continue to offer the bombproof protection it has been shown to offer against all previous mutations of the virus, and this protection includes robust and durable cellular immunity that is largely absent in injection recipients.
Since researchers are finding that variants are becoming increasingly vaccine resistant with each new mutation, and natural immunity has proved to offer highly effective protection against all of these new variants of concern prior to the emergence of Omicron, and this function is fairly well understood by now, there is no reason to anticipate that the body's defenses in those who were previously infected will suddenly fail against Omicron or any future variant for that matter, regardless of how resistant these variants may become to 'vaccine'-induced antibodies, even if the injections eventually prove to be 100% ineffective by establishment calculations some day. At the same time, while 'vaccine'-induced 'protection' begins waning immediately and only lasts some 2-6 months, natural immunity has observably remained strong and robust for well over a year, with peer-reviewed studies suggesting it should provide this same superior protection for decades to a lifetime.
Not only that, the most recent comprehensive peer-reviewed study on natural immunity published by Nature on December 22 found, "Prolonged activation of nasal immune cell populations and development of tissue-resident SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8+ T cell responses following COVID-19," this "indicating that COVID-19 has both transient and long-term effects on upper respiratory tract immune responses," as well as on mucosal immunity; findings which indicate that "long-term protective CD8+ T cell immunity develops in the nasal mucosa of individuals with COVID-19 to act as ‘gatekeepers’ and protect against reinfection," something the current injections by their design simply cannot achieve and a major reason why they are incapable of preventing infection and transmission, or reducing viral load in the nasal cavity. The study authors concluded:
Taken together, we demonstrated that SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8+ T cells in the nasal mucosa can persist for months after viral clearance. This suggests the establishment of local protective immune memory responses that could rapidly control and attenuate reinfections by SARS-CoV-2.
With the emergence of a highly transmissible variant producing mostly mild, cold-like disease with minimal hospitalization and no notable death toll if any deaths at all, naturally acquired herd immunity is set to be rapidly reached with minimal damage, a win-win for everyone but the Big Pharma cartel raking in the endless profits off of the never-ending global injection campaign of the century and the technocrats who have everything to lose if their technocratic agenda that hinges on the digital 'vaccine passport' is stopped in its tracks due to sudden injection campaign failure.
Conclusion
That Omicron is mild and causing little to no deaths is now evident according to all official sources - Bloomberg reported on December 29 that "U.S. Covid deaths are falling even as cases surge," with a 60% increase in cases over the previous week "in large part due to the omicron variant" alongside a 7% decrease in deaths in the same period according to the CDC, NY Times reported on December 30 that, "South Africa Says Its Omicron Wave Has Passed With No Big Spike in Deaths," and a new study out of South Africa also just found that the Omicron variant leads to much less severe disease with the data indicating a whopping 10.7x decrease in death rate compared to all previous Covid waves in the country.
The very same 'vaccine' pushers who promised that their magic potion would prevent infection and transmission, and keep recipients out of the hospital and very much alive are currently insisting that everyone absolutely “needs” to get boosted to protect themselves from this, something more closely resembling the common cold than the flu, let alone a dangerous plague threatening young, healthy children who were never at risk of death even from the deadliest strains of the virus. But still, they keep vehemently pushing the jab on the kids in name of stopping the spread of Omicron.
Their claims were lies back then when they said the shot would prevent infection and the virus would stop with every vaccinated individual, they were lies when they promised the vaxx would keep you from getting Covid and offered bombshell protection against hospitalization and death, and they are still lies now, as they continue to lie to your face and tell you that a 3rd dose booster will somehow stop Omicron in its tracks. It won't, there's nothing safe and effective about these experimental injections, and the booster campaign is designed to boost Pharma profits, not public health and safety.
Why anyone would at this point continue to blindly trust the lying liars, political puppets and professional propagandists behind this vaccination campaign who have been so wrong about every single claim they made about these injections in the name of vanquishing the virus is beyond me, but it is crystal clear now who the real purveyors of medical misinformation over the course of the past year and a half have been; and it isn't the hundreds of doctors, scientists, professors, independent media voices, and vaccine injured individuals all being censored by Big Tech from social media platforms for peddling 'medical misinformation', it is those responsible for the censorship who are peddling the dangerous, ineffective, experimental Covid injections. And no matter how much faith in Fauci and the Covid Cult dogma one has, no amount of trust in these psychopaths or compliance with their dreadfully unscientific dictatorial edicts can ever make a single one of their false claims about these shots magically become true, no matter how many doses of that magic potion one takes.
The whole world can see that these shots are highly ineffective, especially against this Omicron, whatever it is. The question we should probably all be asking ourselves, then, is if they are really merely ineffective against the new variants, or if maybe the new variants like Omicron, and to an extent even Delta, are simply a cover for the damage being caused by this injection campaign used to perpetuate the fear and the cycle of endless boosters. The evidence demonstrates that such a theory is certainly a realistic possibility, what with researchers proving that the spike protein alone created by the injections is actually capable of causing disease, another study finding that mRNA injection negatively influences recipients "in a way as if they experienced infection," and then a more recent peer-reviewed Lancet study finding it to be entirely impossible to differentiate common 'vaccine' side effects from early, mild Covid symptoms which just so happen to be typical of those associated with Omicron, with the authors concluding that: "Post-vaccination symptoms per se cannot be differentiated from COVID-19 with clinical robustness, either using symptom profiles or machine-derived models." That they are capable of selling such a con job to advance their global injection agenda should by now be self evident, but whether or not they actually are is not the subject of this post.
Whatever is going on here, the 'vaccine' narrative is quickly falling apart, while the vaccination coercion campaign fueled by the crumbling narrative remains central to the technocratic, transhumanist agenda driving the rise of the emerging global technocracy designed to enslave us all. Maybe the moral of the story should simply be: 'don't trust lying liars actively working to enslave you and the whole human race.' What else is there left to say? Crazy Clown World, indeed. Welcome to the Revolution, it sure is one wild ride.