In April, FDA put a pause, which is a suspension, on the use of the Johnson & Johnson experimental vaccine following a decision to investigate six reported cases of blood clotting. Were there only six? Or were there more and they only chose to look at six specific cases to investigate?
But the Johnson & Johnson experimental injection isn't the most widely used. It seems to be the least widely used. But the AstraZeneca experimental injection is much more in use, especially in Europe. Why didn't they issue an investigation into the dozens and dozens of blood clot cases from receiving AstraZeneca experimental injection?
There is a disproportional response in effect. They have reacted completely differently between the Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca experimental injection. Why is this? One may claim to investigate and find no issues with. In the other they don't even bother to investigate even others many more cases.
Prior to the move to investigate these cases of blood clots in the Johnson & Johnson experimental injection, the FDA was not carrying out any investigations into other side effects like the video of the two women who experienced uncontrollable shaking in their bodies for weeks, nor reports of miscarriages that have been going on for months. All these other issues are unrelated to the experimental injection, just as they were saying the blood clots were. But now they're just going to look at the blood clot issue, for only one experimental injection candidate.
In the FDA frequently asked questions regarding the Johnson & Johnson experimental injection, they state regarding the decision to suspend or pause the administration of Johnson & Johnson experimental injection:
The safety monitoring program that is in place to monitor COVID-19 vaccines is working, as we were able to detect the reports of these serious adverse events early and take action to assess them. The FDA and CDC will continue to fully investigate all reports to determine if a causal relationship exists.
So they took a hold six cases, and determine that there was a risk but they were going to keep going anyways since the reporting system is so efficient that it can be used to treat people and take action. You can't really treat them laterally if the person has a blood clot and then dies. It's a bit too late.
And the reason for continuing, despite this risk, as that the benefits that they claim are known while others are potential, whatever those alleged benefits may be, according to them, outweigh the known and potential risks for the blood clots.
The FDA and CDC have reviewed all of the available data, including new information since our recommendation to pause the use of the vaccine. Those data, plus the deliberations and recommendations of CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), helped with our assessment that the known and potential benefits of Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine outweigh its known and potential risks in individuals 18 years of age and older. At this time, the available data suggest that the chance of this serious adverse event occurring is very low, but investigation into the level of potential excess risk due to vaccination is ongoing.
The Fact Sheet for Healthcare Providers Administering Vaccine (Vaccination Providers) has been updated to include a Warning pertaining to the risk of thrombosis with thrombocytopenia. The Fact Sheet for Recipients and Caregivers has also been updated to include information about these serious adverse events.
As far as they're concerned, these experimental injections are working, and they're safe enough. How are they working? They work so good that even after you get your full doses of the injections still want you to wear a useless mask, social distance, and obey any other false health recommendations for something that isn't even the threat to 99.95% of the population.
This is why they are lying. Because when you look at the actual data you can know that the threat posed by covid-19 is minimal and essentially nonexistent relative to the alleged level of threat the claim exists. Yet these experimental injections are paraded around as the only solution with known and potential benefits for something that's not even the threat they claim it is. The threat is as real as the flu in previous years, which isn't very high.