Most people don't even know the difference between an emergency use authorization and actual approval of a drug or medical procedure. The former, the EUA, can only be authorized when the state of emergency has been declared. The latter, the approval, is when the FDA actually goes through a process that determines the actual safety and efficacy to say that it's approved. And this takes time.
They didn't have that time for the new experimental injections that alleged to treat covid. The development was rushed, the trials were rushed and were very short, yet the only thing the talking heads in government and mainstream media can do, along with their approved experts, say that these experimental injections are safe and effective. Clearly, with all the cases of heart issues and blood clots and strokes, they are anything but safe.
There is a legal document in the United States for how to grant authorizations for medical products in an emergency: 21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3 - Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies. It's an important read to understand the legality behind the EUA. Especially how they have fraudulently prevented other treatments from being used in their state of emergency, merely as a way to have the legal ability to issue an EUA for experimental injections.
(B) the known and potential benefits of the product, when used to diagnose, prevent, or treat such disease or condition, outweigh the known and potential risks of the product, taking into consideration the material threat posed by the agent or agents identified in a declaration under subsection (b)(1)(D), if applicable;
(3) that there is no adequate, approved, and available alternative to the product for diagnosing, preventing, or treating such disease or condition;
Did you understand that? The benefits have to outweigh the risk for the emergency use authorization. But they couldn't know what the risks were with a very rushed product and lack of safety testing which only lasted a few months, rather than normal years for other products.
Now that the evidence of severe risks from strokes, and even heart attacks, they still are not revising the risks outweighing benefits. The benefits are very minimal because most people are already at a 99.86% survival rate, with those under 25 having barely no risk and only a 0.01% fatality rate. I don't find the benefit outweighs the risk.
Further you can only approve something for emergency use and there is no alternative to prevent or treat the disease or condition. This is why ivermectin, inhaled steroids, and hydroxychloroquine with zinc, or even vitamin D, were aggressively denied by the authorities is even being possibly able to prevent or treat covid.
This is a scam perpetuated around the EUA and the suppression of existing therapies.