The true degree of the harm inflicted by the vaccination effort has long been underestimated and disguised as a result of heavy censorship and pressure placed on physicians, healthcare professionals, and even people who have received vaccinations.
The larger dangers of the Covid19 vaccinations, however, were verified in an evaluation that had to be published by the US authority CDC in the meantime.
Only three months after the commencement of the vaccine campaign, the preparations should have been stopped because of the fatalities and thromboembolic incidents in particular.
Yet, a new, significant controversy is suddenly becoming public. According to a research by the US patient group React19, which speaks for thousands of vaccine injury victims, 42% of complaints are rejected, lost, or withheld from the public.
In any case, these systems only record a small portion of real cases.
Just 6% of adverse effects that had occurred, according to specialists from the Austrian Pharmaceutical Industry Association, were registered, the ORF reported on April 28, 2021.
Based on patient and doctor-submitted reports of vaccine injuries, VAERS is a database that is used to track vaccination safety in the US.
People inside and outside of the government utilize VAERS to assess the safety of vaccinations.
So, it should go without saying that the system must truly have the information that was sent to VAERS. React19 has demonstrated that this is frequently not the case.
Analyzing 126 validated VAERS reports randomly selected among React19 members, they discovered that 5% were never put in the system, another 22% were included but were not made visible to the public, and even an extra 15% of VAERS reports in the system were removed!
The ICAN and its legal team have been informed of the findings of this React19 assessment. The majority of approved reports for lifelong disability and ER trips was very concerning. The outcomes are startling.
A total of 42% of reports in the VAERS system, which is widely utilized across the nation to evaluate the safety of vaccines, were inaccessible.
ICAN's legal team has written to the CDC and the FDA, demanding them to explain why this crucial data, which the public is paying for and entitled to access, isn't available or has been erased in light of these worrisome discoveries.
Whatever the reason, it is unfortunate that this is more evidence that our health authorities are primarily concerned in validating their policies and preconceived assumptions that these items are safe rather than reviewing safety. It becomes more and more obvious that the vaccination campaign's severe harm is still vastly underestimated.